4825
Comments (357)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
157
TehAgent 157 points ago +164 / -7

Dude.

If they can steal an election while he is the sitting President, he and anyone else like him have exactly 0% chances of winning any future election.

101
JohnStark 101 points ago +106 / -5

That people can’t understand this fact is unbelievable to me. Voting will not solve our problems.

25
Sugar4Brains 25 points ago +26 / -1

Soros and his NGO networks showed he is more powerful than the President.

8
EtTuRINOs 8 points ago +8 / -0

To put Soros at the top of this is a mistake.

The CIA for decades rigged elections in other countries. The left was far better at acknowledging this for the longest time and now they act as if it's not the case.

Why bother to rig the election of Nicaragua but then do absolutely nothing to rig the election in the United States, the most powerful and rich entity to ever exist. There are no amount of bananas even close to the payoff of rigging the latter's election.

it's not just the CIA who is in on it. It's the NSA, the FBI, and all the other alphabet agencies.

3
PlebbitorDestroyer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Soros isn't at the top, true. But he's near the top.

14
deleted 14 points ago +17 / -3
6
BlandInquisitor 6 points ago +6 / -0

They only really win if you quit. The left has been great at adapting. We need to learn to do the same.

2
VoteCyborgTrump2040 2 points ago +2 / -0

The "left" aren't great at shit. The globalists/deep state are using them. They control all instutions and power structures. The left would be absolutely crushed if those powers backed the other side. They were crushed anyway, even with them they lost the election. So they committed the greatest fraud in American history.

And then our fearless leader became a cuck and thanked Judas, condemned his supporters, and agreed to stop mentioning how the election was stolen from him.

5
BombtheSystem 5 points ago +6 / -1

Doomposting

Fuck no. There's 74 million people who voted for Trump. Imagine if we started active civil disobedience.

3
fdagasfd 3 points ago +3 / -0

We should still vote, it takes minutes. Make them rig at the very least on top of whatever else we do.

Trump should lead a civil war against the GOP, he has 95% of their constituents. He should establish a presence somewhere where he can do political commentary and endorse GOP candidates that support his policies against establishment ones.

2
EtTuRINOs 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is 1 thing, but in 2 different ways.

Secession/Separation.

Either peacefully or violently.

If you think "saving" the country is an option... oh boy. There is nothing to save. You'd have to tear the government apart anyways. Congress, CIA, FBI, NSA, TSA, ATF, along with tons of unconstitutional laws and somehow deal with judges who abhor keeping their oath to it.

There is no reason people should be united in a country solely based on geography and history. It's foolish to think that'll work. The part that irritates me is if they want to live in a place with no right to guns (in reality it's no right to defend yourself) and no free speech there are plenty of options for them around the globe.

1
LibertyPrimeWasRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem with things like secession is that it’s giving them more ground. If the leftists are allowed control over most of the US, they’re not going to just settle for that.

1
VoteCyborgTrump2040 1 point ago +1 / -0

But if we petition the master and vote not to be slaves, everything will be okay. Surely he will allow it rather than punish us for our insubordination.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
21
DONT_reply_with_THIS 21 points ago +22 / -1

“Muh we’ll get them next time”

There won’t be a next time

-12
BlandInquisitor -12 points ago +2 / -14

Not with that attitude.

3
DonJr2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

They are literally agitating people to come after us even now, after the fact.

You think they will not cheat 10x better next time?

3
Xuvial 3 points ago +3 / -0

They won't need to cheat next time, because there won't be an election next time. Starting tomorrow, USA is a communist regime.

16
Here_we_go 16 points ago +16 / -0

Seriously fucking delusional

14
rebuildingMyself 14 points ago +14 / -0

Don't forget the attack on demographics by offloading millions of illegals and refugees all over red states. Even if the vote becomes credible again, it won't matter when the DNC is offering all these new dependents more gibs in exchange for liberties and how the other side is write supremacists.

6
ComebackKing 6 points ago +6 / -0

Maybe 30 million new blue voters 4 years from now, and no more electoral college.

2
EtTuRINOs 2 points ago +2 / -0

If they add Puerto Rico and DC, say goodbye to Senate control... as if getting someone like McConnell to lead a conservative senate will do anything anyways.

1
TenScoops 1 point ago +1 / -0

Electoral college will definitely go, it's only "muh popular vote" soon

But who the fuck cares. It`s run by Dominion anyway and the Rhino fucks are helping.

1
Kaiheitai 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty soon the gibs will run out.

9
ComebackKing 9 points ago +9 / -0

First step, grant amnesty to all illegals. Second step, open up the boarders. Third step eliminate the electoral college. They won't need Dominion or Ruby Freeman in 2024, they'll have an extra 20 million voters and the popular vote will win.

3
SuckMyAnusTwitter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can someone more eloquent than me explain why doing way with EC is a terrible idea for when they say “the candidate who gets the most votes should win!”

9
DonJr2024 9 points ago +9 / -0

You live in a row of 10 townhouses. You all go in on common expenses like lawn maintenance and roof repairs etc.

EC = each house gets a vote and if the lawn maintenance company sucks balls and is a ripoff, 6 houses vote to fire them and you then vote in a better company and have nice lawns for a good price.

Popular vote = the house at one end (lets call it California for fun) takes in 10 homeless people off the street, and the house at the other end (let's call it NY) takes in 8 homeless people. With their 18 new people they alone can now swing any vote. The shitty lawn care company (that happens to be owned by California's owner's cousin) gets to keep working and charging double and doing a shit job.

The federal government already has way too much power. Taking away the EC would basically end America as it was originally established.

2
SuckMyAnusTwitter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Perfect.

Thank you.

1
Xuvial 1 point ago +1 / -0

We already know that the vast majority of the country voted for Trump, and that democrats made-up their numbers. If we get rid of EC and decide elections based on popular vote, then Trump will win by a mile every time. Mo matter how many "homeless people" CA/NY/etc take in off the street, Trump will always win the popular vote by a landslide.

Getting rid of EC is a surefire way to guarantee all future wins belong to us. The vast majority of USA has always supported Trump, and always will.

5
ImReallyRich 5 points ago +6 / -1

Because the EC grants more power to smaller states. If we didn’t have one then you’d only have to campaign in large cities to win. The needs of NYC and Wyoming are completely different

3
slickbilly777 3 points ago +3 / -0

No EC literally means NY, Chicago, and LA choose the President and make the rules for Wyoming, Montana and other states they’ve never been to and don’t understand. Dems pack those cities with illegal immigrants from the 3rd world that vote for anybody who gives them free stuff and Americans are robbed of their homeland, their values, and their vote forever.

1
JungleJim 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well shit, we just got robbed of all that stuff anyway