16
Comments (6)
sorted by:
2
MichaelNoggerJr 2 points ago +2 / -0

The delicate balance between the individual and the state

2
LegatusGandire [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's less of a balance and more of a the State should have very little to do with people's lives.

2
MichaelNoggerJr 2 points ago +2 / -0

It sure would be cool to live in a stateless society but I'm not holding my breath on that one.

2
LegatusGandire [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Less is more but less is not necessarily anarchy, that's all I'm saying.

  • Welfare? No.
  • Police? No.
  • Public Education? No.
  • Public Healthcare? No.
  • Subsidies for Businesses? No.
  • Any redistribution programs or tax exemptions? No.

Get the government out of society.

2
MichaelNoggerJr 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sometimes I wonder if going back to the warring clans model would be ultimately more satisfying for the majority of people, vs. the current model of consumer-driven clown-world-faux-democracy-zoo run by the absolute wealthy

1
br1337 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes he has been known by many names, Satan, Lucifer, the devil.