Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
He is probably holding on as long as he can for the legal route. If it gets out to the public I am pretty sure it won't be allowed to be used in court. Once he has decided all possibilities have been exhausted I am sure he will release it.
That being said, since it hasn't been released yet that could be some hopium for ya!
Mike Lindell’s point with regard to Dominion is simply, that he was speaking the truth, a complete defense to defamation. But, more importantly, if Dominion was to sue him they would be subject to discovery & would have to reveal everything. Ergo, Mike invites the litigation.
Surely you do not think it is Mike Lindel’s responsibility to prove any aspect of election fraud. He can however reference it honestly and doing so is not defamation.
The evidence that unequivocally demonstrates fraud has been presented in appropriate forums (legislative hearings) and referenced in litigation, by the appropriate people.
To suggest Mike should break out some evidence and suddenly the sleepers such as yourself will see, is a joke.
DO NOT CLICK THE LINK
You answered your own question.
He is probably holding on as long as he can for the legal route. If it gets out to the public I am pretty sure it won't be allowed to be used in court. Once he has decided all possibilities have been exhausted I am sure he will release it.
That being said, since it hasn't been released yet that could be some hopium for ya!
NO ONE WILL DO ANYTHING OR WANTS TO SEE IT! WE ALL SEEN THE EVIDENCE NO ONE GAVE US JUSTICE!
You have to be a shill, anyone who supports Trump has been paying attention and has seen the evidence of election fraud, which is overwhelming.
See for yourself https://hereistheevidence.com/
Mike Lindell’s point with regard to Dominion is simply, that he was speaking the truth, a complete defense to defamation. But, more importantly, if Dominion was to sue him they would be subject to discovery & would have to reveal everything. Ergo, Mike invites the litigation.
Surely you do not think it is Mike Lindel’s responsibility to prove any aspect of election fraud. He can however reference it honestly and doing so is not defamation.
The evidence that unequivocally demonstrates fraud has been presented in appropriate forums (legislative hearings) and referenced in litigation, by the appropriate people.
To suggest Mike should break out some evidence and suddenly the sleepers such as yourself will see, is a joke.