posted ago by TakenusernameA
+88 / -1
We are going to flooded by shills, glowies, and salt-miners who will derail productivity and conversation. I would rather not deal with new being flooded by smug degenerates, so it is best to wait a year so they can come to terms with their decisions. Or starve to death. Whichever comes first.
We are going to flooded by shills, glowies, and salt-miners who will derail productivity and conversation. I would rather not deal with new being flooded by smug degenerates, so it is best to wait a year so they can come to terms with their decisions. Or starve to death. Whichever comes first.
So you're plan is to CANCEL them and not allow them freedom of speech... While also moaning about how conservatives are being CANCELLED & SILENCED!!!
Come on man we're better than that... Also these glowies, doomers, shills and ChiCom infiltrator faggots post obvious glowie shit, and most times it's hilarious mental gymnastics so theres really no harm as we all see they're nutz
look at rule number 1. We are justified in locking down shills.
Yeah because website rules now supersede Human Rights and the Constitution... My bad
How about if they can post only once per day. That way there’s time to deport,before they can be a nuisance.
Nah, because they could make 50 burner accounts. I could see maybe letting them comment once an hour, but they shouldnt be able to post.
As a handshake, I support this
Based handshake.
Our am moving to flooded by shills, glowies, and salt-miners that person would do derail productivity and conversation. Myself will rather don't dealt taking new being flooded by smug degenerates, then it is best to waited that year then those with able to enter to terms taking their decisions. Or starve to dead. Whichever comes first
Personally, I say allow them to speak, for entertainment purposes. They're clearly more heavily invested into this site than shitposter are. Lol