() ⚠️ HIGH ENERGY⚠️
posted ago by JesusLovesTrump ago by JesusLovesTrump +9 / -0
Comments (13)
sorted by:
2
Liberty_Prime 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kim.com?

The motherfucker that conned Hannity into believing he had Hillary's emails?

Oh, nononono...lol!

2
BareKnuckle 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol. Kim Dotfat's predictions are about as accurate as Lin Wood's!

1
ccmunitions 1 point ago +1 / -0

It would be great to see this happen. But the likelihood is slim.

Assange has been branded a pariah for no good reason. He only boldly told the truth.

I am angered and frustrated, and maintain that he has done the right and true duty with his journalistic integrity.

He has been made a victim - and potentially will be made a martyr - for exposing the truth. I do pray for him.

1
BenLurking 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where has this fat fuck been since 2016?

0
BrewSwillis 0 points ago +1 / -1

Fuck Assange!

He let the world believe Trump colluded with Russia over "hacked" DNC emails.

2
Jaybone86 2 points ago +2 / -0

I remember him saying that did not happen.

1
BrewSwillis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, he was real convincing when he wouldn't say who really gave him the emails. Or even showed some kind of proof without "giving up his source".

1
halcyondream 1 point ago +1 / -0

He already implied as much as he could without explicitly saying it that Seth Rich was the one that leaked them.

1
BrewSwillis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why not say it was Seth Rich? The DNC, FBI/CIA, already had him murdered. Why cover up that crime for them? I thought he was supposed to expose corruption, not cover it up?

Nope. Instead he lets Trump get falsely investigated for over two years. And let's the GOP lose seats in the 2018 election...... all because he's "protecting a source", who has already been murdered? 🙄

1
halcyondream 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a wikileaks policy to not reveal sources regardless.

1
BrewSwillis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, what a stupid policy. How about being pragmatic, or just having some common sense instead?

It's like these stupid libertarians, who either vote for their "principles", or nothing at all....... even if it means that socialism takes over.

The right side of the political spectrum is a mess. At least the Dems know what needs to be done to win, even if it's pure evil!

1
halcyondream 1 point ago +1 / -0

You really think that if wikileaks claimed it was Seth Rich they would drop the case? They already had the Russian collusion angle cooked up months before the election as a plan B.

1
BrewSwillis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Claimed? They could have shown evidence. Instead, they just said "trust us".