Comments (9)
sorted by:
4
IHeartMyDoggy 4 points ago +5 / -1

Q never said that

2
Sombradeti 2 points ago +2 / -0

Uhhh JFK Jr. is dead dude.

2
biggerthanpluto 2 points ago +3 / -1

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 0836cc No.4280455 Dec 12 2018 18:47:54 (EST) Anonymous ID: 0e29f7 No.4280260 Dec 12 2018 18:44:01 (EST) 4280189

Is JFK Jr alive? 4280260

No. Q

2
Liberty_Prime 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's the thing about this Q shit.

They just make stuff up sometimes and attribute it to Q.

And because Q followers are the types to not question what they're told, they don't look to see if it even makes sense.

It gets frustrating as hell dealing with someone who is completely convinced of something they didn't even research.

0
biggerthanpluto 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's the same as any other board. /pol/ is full of people that believe anything shills say. Even thedonald has people that believe shill propaganda. You're right. People don't research. Q always emphasized research. But some thick heads just never got the message.

0
Liberty_Prime 0 points ago +1 / -1

I've said it for about a year now.

If Q folk would call out shills posting as Q folk, no one would lump you all as Qtards.

You can't control your own narratives.

Not once have I seen a post that says "I follow Q and wht YOU'RE saying is bullshit" to a pro Q hoaxer..

1
biggerthanpluto 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've always called it out. But yeah. It didn't happen enough. Unfortunately the boards were open to anyone. They were suppose to be strictly for research. But you had people in there posting bs like "We're gonna get them dangum Jews." or "Did you hear Dolly Parton is a lizard person? "

1
Martelo_D_Justicia 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like the others mentioned already, Q never posted anything about that. There was actually a Q&A at some point when someone asked if JFK Jr. is alive and the response was 'No'. That's when random people started claiming that because when a SR dies the JR has a choice to no longer go by JR, hence: "hE's aLiVe cAuSe hE iS nOt a jR aNyMoRe"

This is obviously bull shit. It is fine to speculate on what Q means when they post certain things, cryptic or otherwise. But to attribute every single god damn theory that pops into people's heads as "Q sAiD..." is just fucking ignorant or controlled opposition.

It is LITERALLY all online to go through and read even with a search function to find key words used. I always think to myself:

Why doesn't MSM EVER show an actual Q post to see what is said in their own words?

1
biggerthanpluto 1 point ago +2 / -1

Q never said that. That was was shill fuckery.