Crickets...Can't have it both ways. Either there was NO fraud and the people who swore under penalty of perjury to seeing fraud should be arrested for lying, OR there WAS fraud and those people helped prove it. Can't be both.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Wondered when someone else was gonna notice this. See the thing is, if they did charge them with perjury then the government, would have to prove they are lying which mean a public examination of the evidence and everything that was done was to avoid that examination. That is why I know fraud happened on a large scale.
BINGO!