How can you possibly agree with such a sweeping statement on women being the downfall if the country? For God's sake, Trump had nothing to do with the failures of mostly (I believe) male judges and generals.
Because I choose to look beyond being offended by the generalization of the comment. The perfect world begins with a present and nurturing mother alongside a present and protecting father. I believe everyone's situation is different and adjustments need to be made to fit life. But in general traditional family roles serve kids and families well. I don't think many women have the coldness to choose whether to bomb an area where civilians could be injured. Our natural instinct is to create, not destroy. We are more diplomatic. Only killers when someone is a threat to our nest. I think we would be emotionally vulnerable and open to be manipulated because of that. I think as long as we have a child living on this earth, we would open for manipulation. Hillary doesn't count. She's the devil and an exception to all rules.
Just an example of decisions a POTUS could make I think a female would struggle with making. When replying I was thinking about what I think I would be capable of doing. I have actually thought about it quite a bit and had discussions about it when Hillary was running. But again Hillary is the devil so you can't attach human emotions and actions to her
Well I know there is no person who would not have difficulty making those decisions. Men and women in those positions have both succeeded and failed. Enjoy your opinion.
How can you possibly agree with such a sweeping statement on women being the downfall if the country? For God's sake, Trump had nothing to do with the failures of mostly (I believe) male judges and generals.
Because I choose to look beyond being offended by the generalization of the comment. The perfect world begins with a present and nurturing mother alongside a present and protecting father. I believe everyone's situation is different and adjustments need to be made to fit life. But in general traditional family roles serve kids and families well. I don't think many women have the coldness to choose whether to bomb an area where civilians could be injured. Our natural instinct is to create, not destroy. We are more diplomatic. Only killers when someone is a threat to our nest. I think we would be emotionally vulnerable and open to be manipulated because of that. I think as long as we have a child living on this earth, we would open for manipulation. Hillary doesn't count. She's the devil and an exception to all rules.
I agree with you, but I am not sure why bombing would have been involved.
PTSD from Obummer probably
Except Obama served two terms and had nowhere near the attacks so I do not see the correlation.
Just an example of decisions a POTUS could make I think a female would struggle with making. When replying I was thinking about what I think I would be capable of doing. I have actually thought about it quite a bit and had discussions about it when Hillary was running. But again Hillary is the devil so you can't attach human emotions and actions to her
Well I know there is no person who would not have difficulty making those decisions. Men and women in those positions have both succeeded and failed. Enjoy your opinion.