8 The only way I can make sense of this sentence is if riots were intended to stop objections. Can anyone explain? (media.thedonald.win) posted 2 days ago by bootsy_two_scoops +8 / -0 2 comments share 2 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (2) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 1 ▼ – NZbacon 1 point 2 days ago +1 / -0 That's exactly what they were for. Except they weren't riots permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – schiff_for_brains 1 point 2 days ago +1 / -0 Definitely nobody wanted to be on “the side of the rioters”. More likely, the swamp was just posturing and they used it as the excuse to “change their mind.” permalink save report block reply
That's exactly what they were for.
Except they weren't riots
Definitely nobody wanted to be on “the side of the rioters”.
More likely, the swamp was just posturing and they used it as the excuse to “change their mind.”