121
posted ago by Ssoul +122 / -1

A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.

  1. This Quo Warranto has to be filled at the US District Court for the District of Columbia.
  2. Heres the link to the law https://code.dccouncil.us/dc/council/code/titles/16/chapters/35/#:~:text=A%20quo%20warranto%20may%20be,public%20office%20of%20the%20United
  3. It's a civil trial by jury and the evidence is shown here.
  4. If we would win they just rule Bidens Win Null and Void and would erase his win completely. And Trump continues to be president.

Here's a good article explaining it . https://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2021/01/19/the-maga-counterpunch-is-quo-warranto-in-dc-district-court-show-the-receipts-of-election-fraud/

And here is a 9th circuit court of appeals decision on it. They tried to use it on Obama but didn't have any receipts. https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20111222260#

Here's a California state link explaining how Quo Warranto is to be used and not to be used

https://oag.ca.gov/opinions/quo-warranto

Whew took me like 60 min to put this post together.

A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action. 1. This Quo Warranto has to be filled at the US District Court for the District of Columbia. 2. Heres the link to the law https://code.dccouncil.us/dc/council/code/titles/16/chapters/35/#:~:text=A%20quo%20warranto%20may%20be,public%20office%20of%20the%20United 3. It's a civil trial by jury and the evidence is shown here. 4. If we would win they just rule Bidens Win Null and Void and would erase his win completely. And Trump continues to be president. Here's a good article explaining it . https://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2021/01/19/the-maga-counterpunch-is-quo-warranto-in-dc-district-court-show-the-receipts-of-election-fraud/ And here is a 9th circuit court of appeals decision on it. They tried to use it on Obama but didn't have any receipts. https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20111222260# Here's a California state link explaining how Quo Warranto is to be used and not to be used https://oag.ca.gov/opinions/quo-warranto Whew took me like 60 min to put this post together.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
12
SALTYBALLS 12 points ago +12 / -0

So in 8 years the court will hear the case lol

2
Ssoul [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Was Reading the defendant has 15 days to reply after it's filed . So that part is quic

5
KGB82 5 points ago +5 / -0

No, at this point, Trump would not be president regardless of what happens to biden's fraud win. He didn't get 270 officially. If by some miracle, which would be no miracle now, biden/harris are knocked out, pelosi would be president.

7
Ssoul [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Wouldn't matter if he wins the case it's like biden never existed

6
KGB82 6 points ago +6 / -0

If biden/harris are figured out tomorrow to be corrupt and caught and out by some crazy chain of events, the presidency would be pelosi's. Who knows, maybe that is the plan, in fact.

2
Ssoul [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

You need to read the law and decisions and precedent s. The jury decides solely on the evidence, well if they are honest. And if they say the votes were fake and illegal people voted. Than they erase his win. Like if he never existed. Poof

3
Trumps_legacy 3 points ago +5 / -2

trump doesnt care though. if he did he would of said so

7
Dystopiaslayer 7 points ago +10 / -3

nah. more hopium from Q-tards. military said they would refuse all orders from trump the past few months. funny how you blame trump more than the GOP sacks of shit and the SCOTUS and military who were the ones who backstabbed all of us

2
Ssoul [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Than I think Purdue, McSally, and john james should at least try. We only need 1 of them to succeed. Triples the chance of having an honest jury.

3
sully 3 points ago +3 / -0

The problem is the jury. You think a jury of lefties from DC will decide in Trump's favor? Not a chance in hell.

The path was always military tribunals and it needed to be done before today.

2
Ssoul [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah that's the thing. But you do get to pick your jury from pools. Plus even if Trump doesn't go this route, perdue, McSally, and john james should do this. we only need 1 to win

2
lynnd4111 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks

1
musickey 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump Wins Again! Great News.

1
Ssoul [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Funny the Liberal website law fare actually wrote an article on how the Quo Warranto could be used if trump didn't leave today.

1
jetxlife1 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't want to sound negative but, so far nothing has worked because the system is SO corrupt.

I believe the best we can hope for is more declassified documents to come out exposing the deep state and opening a few more peoples eyes to the corruption, but thats about it.

4 years at least of this garbage fraudulent presidency unfortunately.