Your comment history indicates you're on some kind of "rid the boards of all mention of q" mission, which is fine; free speech and all that. But you are not a mod and thus do not have the authority to tell me what is and isn't okay to post, and what is and isn't newsworthy.
So you're a mod; does that then translate to your being able to decide what is "newsworthy" and what isn't? Is this a new TD rule? And if that's the case, how is this different than mainstream social media, which as you know also doesn't want people posting anything that they disagree with? If this is a new rule, you should really let people know.
I'm not a q-bie or whatever they are called. Given all the q "discussion" on these boards the past three months I find it relevant and interesting. :)
Understood and I believe under normal conditions, I would even consider it newsworthy.
We need to be vigilant about avoiding the topic dilution at the moment.
Entities which are working against the movement will be using any cracks they can find to divide patriots.
Your comment history indicates you're on some kind of "rid the boards of all mention of q" mission, which is fine; free speech and all that. But you are not a mod and thus do not have the authority to tell me what is and isn't okay to post, and what is and isn't newsworthy.
Get off your high horse.
https://patriots.win/moderators
So you're a mod; does that then translate to your being able to decide what is "newsworthy" and what isn't? Is this a new TD rule? And if that's the case, how is this different than mainstream social media, which as you know also doesn't want people posting anything that they disagree with? If this is a new rule, you should really let people know.