To me, globalism, was a way to offshore means of production for the sole purpose of maximizing profit for shareholders.
To me, globalism, was a way to offshore means of production for the sole purpose of maximizing profit for shareholders.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
No, globalism has failed. The vast majority of Americans know this. This is one of the reasons the coup and their regime will fail.
YES...people LOVE progress and crave novelty...But the honeymoons wearing off. Why the fuck, would we take on the worlds problems, without doing a damn good job shoring up our own?
globalism has made the world more dangerous. All of these places we have shipped our jobs/money to under the guise of making the world better/safer have actually increased the amount of military spending up to and including nuke capablities. India went from the 14th? army to number 3 or 4 depending what source used and nukes. Pakistan, china, south am. Mexico. All of these places used the additional money to increase military spending.
That's always the argument, oh your amazing American dollars are lifting so many out of poverty that wouldn't have a chance...I don't buy it.
Right. Chevy moved a bunch of production to Mex. You could compare Chev vs Dodge vs Ford trucks and there was NO Benefit to American consumers. Dge and Ford were a couple grand cheaper for the most part. And WHO needed the bailout??
i agree...the only reason to move things to China or Mex, is because there labor is cheaper. And there labor is cheaper, because they have less laws and shittier governments
And the POLICE enforce slave labor laws for the companies. You WILL Work when and where we tell you.
Yes, globalism is capitalist, and capitalists are the ones pushing it.
I am pro capitalism, was a small business owner for years before this shit. However, I am deeply against globalism. Being a business owner, i got burned a few times.
Why would we do business with jurisdictions where are laws are unenforceable...which is why things are so cheap. Because the bureaucrats benefit.
Because globalist capitalists benefit, and pay bureaucrats to stifle competition.
No, that is a left wing myth. capitalism is free trade, like importing Range Rovers from the UK and exporting mustangs there. shifting jobs in mass to china - subsidized by government slavery, stealing intellectual property, forced ownership rules and etc is not capitalism. its some sort of neo-mercantilism-feudalism.
No, capitalism is not just free trade.
they are not capitalists. they simply use the free market to achieves their means.
The wealthy multibillionaires running massive supercorporations aren't capitalist?
Fascists are pushing it.
No, fascism is inherently strictly nationalist. The globalist capitalists and globalist communists united to kill them for that reason.
I guess I’m not familiar with the definition you are using. My definition is of fascism is simply the means of production are privately owned organized in the form of corporations but the government has strict control of the corporations.
Putting it about as simply as possible, the core of fascism is that the nation (that is, the people) organizes around collective, autocratic state to act in and protect their national interests. It's not simply a political system, nor is it an economic system.