posted ago by B4S3D-P4TR10T ago by B4S3D-P4TR10T +5 / -0

To me, globalism, was a way to offshore means of production for the sole purpose of maximizing profit for shareholders.

Comments (18)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
JaneMN 3 points ago +3 / -0

globalism has made the world more dangerous. All of these places we have shipped our jobs/money to under the guise of making the world better/safer have actually increased the amount of military spending up to and including nuke capablities. India went from the 14th? army to number 3 or 4 depending what source used and nukes. Pakistan, china, south am. Mexico. All of these places used the additional money to increase military spending.

2
B4S3D-P4TR10T [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's always the argument, oh your amazing American dollars are lifting so many out of poverty that wouldn't have a chance...I don't buy it.

2
JaneMN 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right. Chevy moved a bunch of production to Mex. You could compare Chev vs Dodge vs Ford trucks and there was NO Benefit to American consumers. Dge and Ford were a couple grand cheaper for the most part. And WHO needed the bailout??

2
B4S3D-P4TR10T [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

i agree...the only reason to move things to China or Mex, is because there labor is cheaper. And there labor is cheaper, because they have less laws and shittier governments

2
JaneMN 2 points ago +2 / -0

And the POLICE enforce slave labor laws for the companies. You WILL Work when and where we tell you.