I'll take that under advisement. It seems to piss them off ever since dictionarydotcom changed the definition to "a far-right extremist ideology" my 1972 pring OED doesnt say that
Believe me, the definitions of either of those pieces is false. I would advise you look into "Fascism: 100 Questions Asked and Answered". by Sir Oswald Mosley. The book was written by the leader of the British Union of Fascists, so it is straight from the horse's mouth. It is a short read, and PDFs are very easy to find online. Feel free to skim through if you wish, you only need to see a few questions answered to understand.
I don't mind getting an understanding. I read volume 1 of marx' "capital," to gain a better understanding of how they think. He was a lot more fair in defining capitalism than i thought he would be, but the way he employed his definitions in terms of things like inherent value and dialectic relationship to "true value," made it obvious he was thinking from the angle of a persoj who would rather use capitalism as a tool to manipulate market values.
Precisely correct. Marx's critical error was in assuming that the concept of hierarchy was inherently flawed, when in truth it was that hierarchy which formed the basis of civilization. I think you will very much enjoy Mosley, being the interesting fellow that he was.
I'll take that under advisement. It seems to piss them off ever since dictionarydotcom changed the definition to "a far-right extremist ideology" my 1972 pring OED doesnt say that
Believe me, the definitions of either of those pieces is false. I would advise you look into "Fascism: 100 Questions Asked and Answered". by Sir Oswald Mosley. The book was written by the leader of the British Union of Fascists, so it is straight from the horse's mouth. It is a short read, and PDFs are very easy to find online. Feel free to skim through if you wish, you only need to see a few questions answered to understand.
I don't mind getting an understanding. I read volume 1 of marx' "capital," to gain a better understanding of how they think. He was a lot more fair in defining capitalism than i thought he would be, but the way he employed his definitions in terms of things like inherent value and dialectic relationship to "true value," made it obvious he was thinking from the angle of a persoj who would rather use capitalism as a tool to manipulate market values.
Precisely correct. Marx's critical error was in assuming that the concept of hierarchy was inherently flawed, when in truth it was that hierarchy which formed the basis of civilization. I think you will very much enjoy Mosley, being the interesting fellow that he was.
Mosley eh? Suppose i have homework, then. That's good. Gotta keep my brain busy