I somewhat agree with him on that point. Its too easy to plant as evidence and frame an innocent person. It should be illegal to knowingly possess child porn, and child porn should be clearly defined, because otherwise you end up locking up half of the country whos parents took pictures of them playing in the bathtub as a baby.
The problem is the definition of child porn, and how easy it is for feds to plant. Pedophiles shouldnt be allowed to possess any pictures of anyone under the age of 50 though.
I somewhat agree with him on that point. Its too easy to plant as evidence and frame an innocent person. It should be illegal to knowingly possess child porn, and child porn should be clearly defined, because otherwise you end up locking up half of the country whos parents took pictures of them playing in the bathtub as a baby.
Slippery slope. Faggot just wants to watch CP and stroke his tiny dick
The problem is the definition of child porn, and how easy it is for feds to plant. Pedophiles shouldnt be allowed to possess any pictures of anyone under the age of 50 though.
Your statements are retarded. I don't know how else to respond. Wow.
Get yourself checked out?
And if you're a closet pedo/ pedophile sympathizer maybe do yourself in.
Holy shit you picked this hill ....