You will understand my reasoning when feds start dragging people from their homes for having pictures they never downloaded. The state should not have that much power to frame people.
I'm not siding with pedophiles. I never said child porn was ok, because it is absolutely disgusting. But it shouldn't be an excuse to destroy someone's life if they could be innocent.
You will understand my reasoning when feds start dragging people from their homes for having pictures they never downloaded. The state should not have that much power to frame people.
They have it now. Again, you lost me when you started siding with pedophiles. I'm not going along with any reasoning that supports or helps that.
I'm not siding with pedophiles. I never said child porn was ok, because it is absolutely disgusting. But it shouldn't be an excuse to destroy someone's life if they could be innocent.
We could use that same argument and logic for all laws then. Should we decriminalize everything because some individuals might not be guilty?
Again--You choosing THIS particular hill to die on just seems rather suspect, but whatever person I don't know on the internet.