5904
Comments (447)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
0
00937600 [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ya, many are just as retarded as any average American MSM watcher.

https://www.greatfallstribune.com/story/news/2021/01/20/president-joe-biden-cancels-keystone-xl-pipeline-tribal-members-montana-react/4215834001/

Foote, 68, is an elder of the Fort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes, and she feared the pipeline, which passes through a portion of Montana near the Fort Peck Reservation, would contaminate the tribes' water supply.

Legit retards.

1
Diet_Loam 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you misunderstood. I’m familiar with the native arguments against, as those are amplified by the media.

I’m looking for natives in favor. I suspect many are but are suppressed for optics.

1
00937600 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Naw, I understood, I literally couldn't find any for it, which is why I produced the only thing I could find quickly.

Also, if you are curious about the actual numbers regarding pipeline safety, I found this, https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/data-and-statistics/pipeline/pipeline-incident-20-year-trends

Also found this. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/article/pipelines-are-safest-way-transport-oil-and-gas#:~:text=In%20every%20year%20from%202003,compared%20to%200.049%20for%20pipelines.

We're all natives now, and we all matter, and if it ain't backed by evidence I won't even entertain it.

1
Diet_Loam 1 point ago +1 / -0

But given those numbers in the article pertaining to funding there must hav been negotiations with native groups that supported it.