Be careful. There’s nothing that says a Constitutional Convention can be limited to a single change. So if we call for one, everything is on the table, including the bill of rights.
IMO it might be too risky right now, with the constant attacks on the 1A and 2A, to even think about a convention. We might get term limits, but also lose our rights to “hate speech,” and firearms.
This is not true and you are spreading misinformation that is harmful to our best peaceful solution to taking back this country. An Article V Convention could not result in destruction of the Bill of Rights unless it was SPECIFICALLY called to do so, BEFORE the Convention met.
Be careful. There’s nothing that says a Constitutional Convention can be limited to a single change. So if we call for one, everything is on the table, including the bill of rights.
IMO it might be too risky right now, with the constant attacks on the 1A and 2A, to even think about a convention. We might get term limits, but also lose our rights to “hate speech,” and firearms.
This is not true and you are spreading misinformation that is harmful to our best peaceful solution to taking back this country. An Article V Convention could not result in destruction of the Bill of Rights unless it was SPECIFICALLY called to do so, BEFORE the Convention met.