237
Comments (12)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
EtTuRINOs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump has demonstrated that he's not capable (or the task is just impossible) to gather enough effective trusted allies to his side to achieve the kind of results he promised us (HRC in jail, drain the swamp...).

It's clear the latter involves pretty much getting rid of most of the federal government and its agencies.

As for the former, Hillary was NEVER going to prison for her crimes. You seriously still think the FBI would've handed him the evidence they had on Hillary?? The same government agencies that lied and withheld info all throughout his 4 years?

Trump has demonstrated that he's not capable (or the task is just impossible)

I think it's both. The governments that aren't irrevocably broken yet will eventually become broken. It's the perpetual cycle of any government, even if they're set up well in the beginning.

1
johndude 1 point ago +1 / -0

You seriously still think the FBI would've handed him the evidence they had on Hillary?

It's never been a question of detaining the evidence.

1
EtTuRINOs 1 point ago +1 / -0

When they would need to bring the case to a grand jury? Yes, having the evidence would matter.

You couldn't just point to old stories talking about the verified evidence.

1
johndude 1 point ago +1 / -0

There will be no "grand jury". I'm sure they have all the evidence they need. Everybody in the swamp knows the evidence. But there will never be a grand jury just like there was no grand jury about the election fraud evidence.

The closest thing that resembled a grand jury for election fraud was the legislature hearings led by Giuliani. See what the media did with that? See what the courts did with that? See what the legislators did with that? Crickets.

1
EtTuRINOs 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know there will be no grand jury. I'm saying if any of Trump's attorney generals tried to convict Hillary, it would fail since the FBI is not going to give them the evidence they had collected.

Wasn't that the beginning of this and my reply??