There will be no "grand jury". I'm sure they have all the evidence they need. Everybody in the swamp knows the evidence. But there will never be a grand jury just like there was no grand jury about the election fraud evidence.
The closest thing that resembled a grand jury for election fraud was the legislature hearings led by Giuliani. See what the media did with that? See what the courts did with that? See what the legislators did with that? Crickets.
I know there will be no grand jury. I'm saying if any of Trump's attorney generals tried to convict Hillary, it would fail since the FBI is not going to give them the evidence they had collected.
It's never been a question of detaining the evidence.
When they would need to bring the case to a grand jury? Yes, having the evidence would matter.
You couldn't just point to old stories talking about the verified evidence.
There will be no "grand jury". I'm sure they have all the evidence they need. Everybody in the swamp knows the evidence. But there will never be a grand jury just like there was no grand jury about the election fraud evidence.
The closest thing that resembled a grand jury for election fraud was the legislature hearings led by Giuliani. See what the media did with that? See what the courts did with that? See what the legislators did with that? Crickets.
I know there will be no grand jury. I'm saying if any of Trump's attorney generals tried to convict Hillary, it would fail since the FBI is not going to give them the evidence they had collected.
Wasn't that the beginning of this and my reply??