6962
posted ago by Shadowman3001 [M] ago by Shadowman3001 +6967 / -5

As we feared, the owner of the old domain has already betrayed the community and redirected the domain. After the redirect propagates, hundreds of thousands of loyal patriots may not know where to find home!

Spread the word that we've moved! Gab, Twitter, etc! Here's an example (Also, new Gab account for the new domain name):

https://gab.com/PatriotsDotWin/posts/105594470022099271

Edit-

A lot of concerns have actually been answered by more technically savy users in the comments,

u/YouNeedVPN

No, they said if you were logged out, that was bad. And that the new site would likely blindly accept the first password provided. I was not logged out. My browser does not remember passwords, so it could not have logged me back in. Or... It's all bullshit and it's been compromised for a while already. Probably back when that 'hold the line' lie started.

u/jslenterprises

the cookie is still valid, which means that the front end hosts are the same, the back end db is the same. URL may be different, but everything else is the same. Even the ssl cert is the same.

u/ireallylikedogs2

Yep. The fact the domain changed and SSL didn't freak out is a good thing. To every pede that doesn't know what that means... it means a ton of extremely annoying extra measures on your computer designed to warn you if something's amiss, aren't ringing. And trust me, they got super annoying the past 2 years. So I feel safe. The token is still valid, the cert is good, AND the domain name changed... even the most secure site will freak out if you change a domain name, unless you've set up a line of trust. Well it looks like they setup a line of trust. So there.

EDIT-

Dusted off the old poorly underused, but verified, thedonaldreddit Gab account for additional verification:

https://gab.com/thedonaldreddit/posts/105595244151890950

Edit- As far as media posts go, it's fixed for new posts, being worked on for old ones.

Comments (766)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
409
deleted 409 points ago +427 / -18
157
Doggos [M] 157 points ago +161 / -4 stickied

Addressed situation here: https://patriots.win/p/11SJoRs6Iz/x/c/4Dvm6MJFE6J

This is true, but I think our story adds up. I don't believe I said if the site changes, then it's a honeypot. The focus was on the private data, like passwords. Plus, you shouldn't have been logged out.

Your passwords will still work, and try what I suggested (the wrong password) to verify that.

Do note, however, that you may get locked out if you try the wrong password too many times.

227
GenericInsult 227 points ago +241 / -14

To all the fags spinning the conspiracy theory that this site is now a "FBI Honeypot".... you sound like idiots.

Even if it was a "FBI Honeypot" .... who the fuck cares? We are not doing anything illegal.

Everything aside, if you don't think the FBI knows who each of is by now you are delusional.

111
RonPaulWasRight 111 points ago +118 / -7

Under the Biden administration, calling someone a faggot is a hate crime. Better safe than sorry.

139
GenericInsult 139 points ago +141 / -2

Me: Not caring.

53
glorious_phagg0t 53 points ago +54 / -1

FBI and Biden are faggots

32
ObamasLooseButthole 32 points ago +32 / -0

Biden is a faggot.

22
Liver-Eatin-Johnson 22 points ago +22 / -0

Faggot

11
Spezz 11 points ago +11 / -0

just about every post ive ever made includes the word faggot but its cool i’m an LGBT ally or seomthing

39
flabbyfanny1 39 points ago +40 / -1

This. 3 letter agencies have so much technical ability it is insane. The only way to avoid them is to completely be off-line, or have very strict protocols (which most normal people wouldn’t do). If the FBI, etc want to arrest me for being conservative then that’s a hill I am willing to fight (and die) on.

15
KX909 15 points ago +15 / -0

They have all that technical ability thanks to our tax dollars. We're paying them to hunt us, and to hunt us for doing nothing wrong. At lease if the constitution still has legal force. If they are no longer honoring specific amendments, then the whole thing is cashed, and they are going to have a very difficult time running this country.

3
MAGA_APN 3 points ago +3 / -0

they have so much technical ability that they still have ZERO info on the Vegas shooter and did nothing to stop the most recent bomber. They are losers

30
TrudopesEyebrow 30 points ago +31 / -1

This new domaine is in good hands. The old one was not.
It’s a smart move. Our TopMods are solid as fuck. The old mod played himself.
The branding barely changed, front page is identical. Trump is the man. Stop crying.

7
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 7 points ago +7 / -0

We got Doggos, the prog genius! That's definitely the right side <3 🐶

5
KX909 5 points ago +5 / -0

Some of those hit pieces were absolutely vicious (and of course totally misrepresented the nature of the site). I guess it generated a lot of heat in some people's minds. Given the obvious witch hunt atmosphere of the moment, and the seeming willingness on the part of three letter agencies to kill people to hide their plots, I don't really blame people for being paranoid. But dude didn't have to throw us under the buss. Those articles were so inaccurate.

21
jedavis 21 points ago +23 / -2

This pede deep states!

Spez: in reference to your comment about the feds knowing who every one of us are. You hit the nail on the head.

11
deleted 11 points ago +14 / -3
10
YouNeedVPN 10 points ago +11 / -1

Everything aside, if you don't think the FBI knows who each of is by now you are delusional.

Quoting to highlight. Everyone needs to understand this.

7
GenericInsult 7 points ago +7 / -0

It is amazing that so many people think they are truly anonymous on the internet.

Big Tech knows exactly who each and every person is on the net, and to think that they don't willingly share this info with any the three-letter agencies is ludicrous / ignorant.

25
deleted 25 points ago +25 / -0
9
jslenterprises 9 points ago +9 / -0

takes time to cover all secondary and tertiary links.

12
MycologyofMAGA 12 points ago +12 / -0

u/Doggos , do we own TheDonald.XYZ?

10
ChuckedBeef 10 points ago +10 / -0

What happened to the Donald.space?

1
Smug_zebra 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tried that earlier. I assume Jody ownes that. I feel like the pro Q people dominated the conversation over the last few months, but to throw everyone under the bus and change the domain is unexcusable. I am trying to be understanding, but he basically did to us what amazon did to Parler because he didn't want to be called out in the fake news.

5
Pickles76 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's how I found/rerouted to this site, seems to work but not sure about ownership. Just glad it worked!

4
SleeperAg20 4 points ago +4 / -0

TD.XYZ got me here. Haven't tried the other backup site.

2
SouthernParadise 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s what got me here too

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
SineTheGreat 4 points ago +5 / -1

I’m not a geek with computers but why not use .xyz, or .one? Seems kinda suspicious.

78
MAGAlikethis 78 points ago +80 / -2

Who the fuck even pays for the hosting here? This has never been answered.

42
veritasvincit 42 points ago +42 / -0

How much would hosting a comparable site of this size cost per month? That would give us a clue as to who could be paying for it.

37
debacle 37 points ago +39 / -2

Thousands of dollars on the low end just for hosting, plus all of the dev effort, PM, etc.

18
veritasvincit 18 points ago +19 / -1

Is it plausible that Trump, himself, is a private anonymous donor? Is it a small group of private anonymous donors? Something more ominous?

11
Dennislearsysbastard 11 points ago +11 / -0

True. I thought it was from some random PAC. Or a Bannon maybe DTJ pet project.

1
Grunge 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not even close. It is probably closer to 300-1000 a year.

2
labiator 2 points ago +2 / -0

former owner mentioned costs in the video $600 mentioned can't remember if per month or annum

1
Smug_zebra 1 point ago +1 / -0

A domains are pretty cheap. Maybe $30 per year, and around $180 for the certificates. Hosting depends on platform and services. This site has way more traffic then anything I have ever done.

27
brie_cheese 27 points ago +28 / -1

I thought I remember Doggos saying the mods paid/pay for all this themselves and have repeatedly refused donations. I can't link to a source though, it's just what I remember.

27
stjimmy92 27 points ago +27 / -0

Yes the modss pay for it themselves and will not accept donations because it opens the door for someone to control the site by threatening the funding.

8
brie_cheese 8 points ago +8 / -0

Thanks for clarification!

10
debacle 10 points ago +10 / -0

If they accept donations they will be showing us who owns the site.

8
RonPaulWasRight 8 points ago +8 / -0

Not if they accept cryptocurrency.

20
MostlyPeaceful 20 points ago +22 / -2

I want to know. I dont appreciate anything less than full transparency.

I have no idea what happened, only that there was some disagreement and the original domain owner claimed a foreign individual has control of the site and mod team.

The name is fine with me but this is all vwry unsettling. Can we have some more involved answers pleae?

Original domain owner on adamcastirl https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SJCugtAd6pg

12
WinstonSmith1776 12 points ago +12 / -0

Just don't post anything stupid and (more or less) it doesn't matter. Anyone who wants can see everything. Federal LEO can certainly access PM's, etc. Nobody is hiding shit from .GOV Hackers.

Fact of the matter is that NSA Whistleblower William Binney pointed out in the early 2000's that the central internet hubs run by ATT&T and the like had splitters that funneled ALL online communications to gargantuan NSA underground server facilities.

Not saying I don't care, but unless you are sending communications directly, person to person, with the HIGHEST level of open-source encryption, ZERO communications are truly secure. Nobody realized for years that many of the old trusted encryption apps were compromised by default. Hell, they were able to digitally fingerprint TOR communications over ten years ago.

5
CuomoisaMassMurderer 5 points ago +5 / -0

Binney had an AMA here. Gov is overrun with so much information they can't use any of it. They have everything yes, but it still takes a human to do anything with it. The notion that each of us here is so damn important they devote the resources to even know who we are already is laughable.

Now, under the current administration would they prioritize that more highly? Sure. Wastefulness is what they're all about.

2
Mooksayshigh 2 points ago +2 / -0

What difference at this point does it make? Fuck the feds, come and get me.

3
deplorableman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dude, that is unfindable tru search on youtube

3
Triiton 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

You're not making sense. You're asking to dox people who are already seen as the enemy by those who now run the Country.

Also the guy in the video is doxxed by anybody who wants to, which is weird af.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
10
DickTick 10 points ago +11 / -1

Yes it has.. many times... The original core group of mods pay for that of their own pockets.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
6
zekin 6 points ago +7 / -1

I guess someone's whos got a little bit of money and believes in free speech.

They if I remember correctly said they can't reveal it because then they run the risk of getting cut off from financial resources

-1
MAGAlikethis -1 points ago +3 / -4

And now they have to change the name or run the risk of getting cut off from financial resources.

What must they do next or run the risk of getting cut off from financial resources?

4
CuomoisaMassMurderer 4 points ago +4 / -0

None of that is true. Read the thread.

1
DonJr2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are very confused. I don't mean that in a mean way. Maybe you aren't very technical. Everything is fine. The mod who had the domain name we were using cucked out. The site is otherwise unchanged and he is out of the picture.

52
deathbymonty 52 points ago +53 / -1

To the top you go!

23
hint 23 points ago +23 / -0

Also why would the old owner betray us like this now? None of this sounds right. If he's afraid, he can either handover OR leave the current redirect to this site alone.

22
deleted 22 points ago +23 / -1
2
FireannDireach 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don't need to be on the site to redirect a domain, that can all be done by someone who has never loaded this site into a browser.

DNS and domains and all of that operate in a completely different space as the actual site.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

How does all this redirecting work? Redirect wars begun, they have? Why would I consistently be redirected to patriots.win and nowhere else?

18
deplorableman 18 points ago +18 / -0

In the WSJ article it seems they discovered who owned the domain.. I guess he got under tremendous pressure.

Imagine having your name linked to this site. You probably get offered big amounts of money to literally sell out, threatened by sjw lawyers or have your family harassed. Or most likely, all of them at once.

15
GR-Abass 15 points ago +15 / -0

tremendous pressure

I believe you meant truinnerashuvaduprezure.

6
I_Used_to_be_me 6 points ago +6 / -0

I mean, he was recently on AdamCast IRL, so it's not exactly secret or like WSJ did any investigative work

1
labiator 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it was discovered before that by some far leftist coder tech type. I remember reading his boast somewhere.

17
HeavenlyTrumpets 17 points ago +18 / -1

I've seen rumor that the owner of the site was getting scared and wanting to implement a lot of rules censoring perfectly legitimate topics of discussion... I'm not sure if that's true, but I've seen it floating around many times.

11
Kamalas_a_Bitch 11 points ago +12 / -1

Yeah I guess the WSJ article was right about that part. Sounds like the owner cucked out hard.

1
newuser999 1 point ago +1 / -0

You mean epik? They are the dns provider

5
DongSquad420 5 points ago +6 / -1

Rofl, its the same shit since the reddit days. There's always been a rogue mod or two. Mods need to be completely transparent about this and start disclosing some info imo.

2
I_Used_to_be_me 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think he was just on Adamcast IRL the other day (the owner of the former domain name) — I actually had it on, but it was while I was working so I wasn't really paying attention tbh

47
deleted 47 points ago +56 / -9
25
Loc12 25 points ago +25 / -0

It will take a few hours for the old domain to stop working, once the DNS propagates the redirect won't work

11
Easter_Bunny 11 points ago +11 / -0

DNS record is set to 300 seconds, I don't see that it's redirected yet.

Actually SOA is coming and going, it's definitely in transition.

14
Libertas_Vel_Mors 14 points ago +14 / -0

The redirect will last for awhile until any further changes propagate outward.

12
Dictator_Bob 12 points ago +15 / -3

For all we know this is a lovers quarrel or the site was mirrored and cut off by a hostile party. We do not have any understanding of custody and there is no public information on who has financial control of this product. There is a fear of "doxxing" to consider however at some point someone needs to be known, vetted, and tied to the Trump movement.

1
MostlyPeaceful 1 point ago +3 / -2

This. When exactly are we going to learn that blindly trusting that freedom on the net will be upheld doesn't ever pan out?

8
Dictator_Bob 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well, we do have an illegitimate government that controls all the means of information/communication to the public. The same group is sending a constant stream of threats to the citizenry should they attempt to even disagree with them online. Which, apparently, is ineffective as the public backlash has been hilarious!

So now is a good time to ask for extraordinary measures to protect confidence.

5
CuomoisaMassMurderer 5 points ago +5 / -0

The betrayal is as simple as not turning control of the domain over. This is stated simply.

0
TrudopesEyebrow 0 points ago +5 / -5

I can assure you he hasn’t exactly gone dark 🙄

2
DonJr2032 2 points ago +8 / -6

Your assurance has failed me. You are not a mod. For all we know, you know absolutely nothing and are spreading FUD.

Prove it or shut up

10
waitingisthehardest 10 points ago +10 / -0

the dude did a big livestream and a national news article :P

7
1134hst 7 points ago +7 / -0

Guy literally was on Adam cast a day or 2 ago

45
deleted 45 points ago +46 / -1
18
ciemPepe 18 points ago +20 / -2

Regarding 7] What is being done to stop real FBI agents / Malicious agents using this platform to create unrest whilst using it as an escape goat? Outside of the normal moderation of removing glowy posts and banning them, not much else can be done.

Why not have like a quarntine area where posts made by handshakers are sent automatically until they are approved (by upvotes) by the community? Also may I suggest that users with high karma (you decide the threshold based on stats) can send post immediately to quarantine.

10
theObjectiveTruth 10 points ago +11 / -1

I second this. Even a group for individuals over a certain karma threshold that can be easily identified with the ability to approve posts from "new users" to help the mods with the load.

8
BlinkinSun 8 points ago +8 / -0

This does sound like a good idea but there would need to be a post review to make sure that there aren’t outside actors creating accounts, getting easy karma with “<—— this many pedes hate Biden” and then using the status to censor real information which needs to get out. Perhaps flagged posts are hidden until approved by five randomly selected people with high karma can also review and the majority wins?

4
Lukemia 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't like that. I hated reddit because I couldn't post anything because I didn't have karma, but my account was 5 years old. I also couldn't get karma because I wasn't able to post on threads I was passionate about and I wasn't gay enough to farm karma to post on them. Don't be a lib and take away peoples voices..

A possible idea.. handshakes accounts post ...1-5 deports locks the account and hides the post and all further posts pending a moderator (which you would plead your case (to lessen the amount mods will have to review( because most people that don't care about the thread won't fill out a rebuttle))) then the mod can decide to allow or permanently ban. Now you can use the handshake symbol as a karma hurdle ( 1000 karma to take off your handshake icon) at which you require more deports to face the mods (10 deports on a single post) and have another icon for 10,000 karma making it even harder to silence you (15 deports) that way it makes it harder for bots to make your thread ghost and also you can reward your members with dumb ass icons to increase discussions and debates. We can also have people with higher levels be able to see ghosted posts and vote (5 votes unhides the ghosted post) that way the mods don't have to work as much and if it gets deported again then a mod has to deal with it. We can also choose to deport obvious karma farmers to not mess with the way things are ran.This is kinda off the top of my head feel free to expand ( sorry if its a hard read im super dyslexic)

2
Grunge 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would never have posted or stayed on the site if new users were treated like shit. That is some reddit level crap.

Just need to ban all the racist shit that has no place here. There is a reason I joined and left the discord channel long before it was banned. It was full of racist edgy children. Basically 4chan.

9
Forgotmypass666 9 points ago +9 / -0

was that if you were asked to log back in it would be a fake site. That would mean they didn't have the database of login info and were trying to steal yours or get you to start using their site with a new password. If anything, passwords being saved is proof that we're still the same people.

Hey, Um.... Didn't this exact thing happen like a month's or two ago?

9
Stickyourheadndoodoo 9 points ago +9 / -0

Only when that happened, they clearly still had the backend database because my username with an incorrect password didn't work. I was only able to log in after a few attempts when I finally remembered my password.

A fake site would have accepted any password I gave it since they wouldn't have had the backend data.

9
DCdeplorable 9 points ago +9 / -0

The Great Password Forgettening is simultaneously proof of the system's validity, and the tragic loss of too many good accounts...

4
Forgotmypass666 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was never able to remember my password.

2
LiquidAsylum 2 points ago +2 / -0

yupp

1
NotAnotherNPC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Having done stuff dealing with login info before.... I have a few bits of info for non-techies reading this post...

  1. it's very poor practice to actually store a plain text copy of the password. What is usually done is to take a hash value of a server specific value (set in configs or other handy spot) and the hash value. When someone logs in, the server will accept their plain text password (hopefully over SSL) and recalculate the hashed value. It will then compare the 2 hashes to see if they match up.

  2. Hashes are a one way function. You should not be able to take the hash and then calculate the inputs to it.

  3. Cookies can save your session, allowing future access without logging back in... until they expire or the host is identified as something else. The reason you need to log back in for reason #2 should set off a red flag... big red flag.... almost CHINA red flag.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
stagolee 5 points ago +5 / -0

If your servers were seized, they would have your database as well, and passwords would work. I would suggest a dead hand type mechanism. Something buried in the code, such that if everything was seized, and you were put under a gag order not to say anything, a ticking clock would fire off and shut it down or something. You wouldn't be violating anything, since they took control of what was there.

1
NotAnotherNPC 1 point ago +1 / -0

tools like Norton Ghost can be run to make exact duplicates of the hard drive storing the data. I REALLY hope they used disc encryption as well so that it's encrypted while powered down. Would stop any sort of malarkey with taking the drive and ghosting it.

3
DIARRHEA_FIGHT 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just curious, didn't faggotmod notice these protective measures as they were announced? All the backup domains, the warning about being asked to log back in, etc? Was he oblivious to the fact that you all were talking about him? If not, why do the redirect now and not whenever he left?

5
Justin_is_Fidels_Son 5 points ago +5 / -0

From what I've read elsewhere, the rogue dude did 0 work. He just registered the domain. May not have even understood the point of those posts if he doesn't understand the technical side of things.

2
BatmanForTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

He hasn't redirected it yet, he's going to probably this week, so they're still leveraging it to redirect people here before he does, a URL is just an identifier, he can own the domain but if he doesn't have access to the servers he can't do anything with it, so even if he knew they were talking about him he will still have to go through the process of redirecting the domain, and even if he knew the warning about being asked to log back in, he can't do anything with that, the only way to spoof that would be to recreate the UI of the site and also have access to the DB where usernames and passwords are stored or recreate the DB with the usernames, passwords, comments, posts, updoots, saves etc (which would be impossible without having access to the current DB where that is all stored, which he doesn't as far as I understand)

2
trollef 2 points ago +4 / -2

If anything, passwords being saved is proof that we're still the same people.

I'm hoping this is just informal wording, but please tell me this site is not actually saving users' passwords.

10
infeststation 10 points ago +11 / -1

Of course it is. That's why when you log in, the website doesn't say DeRFffff ??????? 🤤🤪

The way passwords are stored is typically something called salt and hash. It's essentially a one way ticket: when you type your password, it turns it into a jumbled mess, and that's what's saved. You can't turn that jumbled mess back into your password, but you can check to see if the jumbled mess you just sent is the same as the one stored in the database.

What they can do is figure out the salt and hash, and then they can make a table of popular passwords. That's why password strength is important.

2
NotAnotherNPC 2 points ago +2 / -0

you mean "Password" isn't a good password? How about "incorrect" so if I forget it, the computer says "Your password is incorrect" and reminds me?!?!

-2
trollef -2 points ago +3 / -5

Of course it is. That's why when you log in, the website doesn't say DeRFffff ???????

Well, no. No serious website stores passwords.

The way passwords are stored is typically something called salt and hash

I know how salting and hashing works. The point is that it's very much not the same as storing passwords (in plaintext), which is what the comment I responded to seemed to imply was being done.