Okay first off, I wouldn't turn over control of the site to random people online either. Second, I heard WSJ misrepresented him. It was even posted on TD.WIN for fucks sake.
Also, just had someone else tell me that he is upset that the code isn't open to all the mods.... lots of conflicting news. Plus, why not just make a post saying all the red flags that caused the switch? Why just say "he's a backstabber so we moved". That was mishandled.
Also, your sarcasm means you are a poor debater. I know what coding is, because I do it for a living. Including website development, data science, and app development.
but you've been given answers and you're not even mulling them over or seeing what they mean, before you ask the same questions again.
and no not 'every post here' is from some 'random person'.
the mods are marked as mods, for example. and in the WSJ article, the 'rogue mod' as they're calling him, himself admitted that THEY created the code. THEY actually built the site. not sure how in your mind that equates to them being random. but can you explain? can you explain to me how in your mind the people who built this site are 'random'? i'd love to hear that explanation, thanks.
You know what I meant by "random person". I didn't mean the mods.
And you clearly didn't read my thread because I directly asked a specific question and got a dodgy response. Hell, random people here are giving me ACTUAL reason for why the switch. All mods have said is "he held the site hostage" which sounds to me like a spin on the truth of someone not trusting the site to anyone but themselves.
Okay first off, I wouldn't turn over control of the site to random people online either. Second, I heard WSJ misrepresented him. It was even posted on TD.WIN for fucks sake.
Also, just had someone else tell me that he is upset that the code isn't open to all the mods.... lots of conflicting news. Plus, why not just make a post saying all the red flags that caused the switch? Why just say "he's a backstabber so we moved". That was mishandled.
The only thing I needed to read:
Translated: "maybe they didn't handle it 100% perfectly but how often is any election ever handled perfectly?"
Also, your sarcasm means you are a poor debater. I know what coding is, because I do it for a living. Including website development, data science, and app development.
Neither "he himself" nor "some random person here" would be credible. But then again, EVERY post on here is from some random person.
Look, I get it. I'm just asking questions, something more people need to do.
but you've been given answers and you're not even mulling them over or seeing what they mean, before you ask the same questions again.
and no not 'every post here' is from some 'random person'.
the mods are marked as mods, for example. and in the WSJ article, the 'rogue mod' as they're calling him, himself admitted that THEY created the code. THEY actually built the site. not sure how in your mind that equates to them being random. but can you explain? can you explain to me how in your mind the people who built this site are 'random'? i'd love to hear that explanation, thanks.
You know what I meant by "random person". I didn't mean the mods.
And you clearly didn't read my thread because I directly asked a specific question and got a dodgy response. Hell, random people here are giving me ACTUAL reason for why the switch. All mods have said is "he held the site hostage" which sounds to me like a spin on the truth of someone not trusting the site to anyone but themselves.