posted ago by UnemployedMarx +5 / -1

I just see it as healthy competition and the reality. What is wrong is everyone trying to pretend race doesn't matter, while you are destroyed because of your race and you fail to actually create a defensive against your own destruction because you're too afraid to offend someone. The left talks race every day. Race matters. The sooner you figure that out and adapt to the reality, the sooner you can formulate a real defensive.

I just see it as healthy competition and the reality. What is wrong is everyone trying to pretend race doesn't matter, while you are destroyed because of your race and you fail to actually create a defensive against your own destruction because you're too afraid to offend someone. The left talks race every day. Race matters. The sooner you figure that out and adapt to the reality, the sooner you can formulate a real defensive.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
UnemployedMarx [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Traditional white culture I would agree. Right now we treat men like garbage and unjustly elevate women. We also have too many human rights that should not be rights at all. There's also nothing inherently good about LGBTQ+ and we overly promote gays and trans in our society. Traditional white culture in the 1800s was great. Everything post WWII has been a disaster and has been degradation toward our downfall.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
UnemployedMarx [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

There's a big difference between negatively discriminating against someone and having an LGBTQ+ group in every profession, having groups in schools/universities, having our media/hollywood promote the frequency of gay people at 10x+ the actual real life frequency, etc...

People are naturally gay so it will always exist but it isn't something our society should promote. There's nothing inherently good about it so it shouldn't be promoted.

2
B4S3D-P4TR10T 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, we need to talk about race in reality. Everyone is allowed to be a supermisist except white people. And we are being actively targeted for genocide.

Ireland is full of irish people JAPAN is full of japanese people Sweden is full of swedes.

There is nothing wrong with Nationalism, and pride of your people. The only people who say that there is, are regurgitating, or are actively trying ro subvert.

I grew up in a heavy blue state, the anti white propaganda is real, and it works.

2
UnemployedMarx [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

Did you know there was a recent study I read where men and women were broken up into liberal and conservative groups (self identified) then were told to rate people based on physical attractiveness? The study found ALL groups had racial in-group preference except one, can you guess which group? So what I'm saying is, black liberals preferred black people. Asian conservatives preferred Asian people... Well, you guessed it. White liberals showed no in-group preference. They were the only group that did not have in-group racial preference. The anti-white propaganda works and it's leading to our destruction. Nothing good comes of it.

1
TwistedSister 1 point ago +1 / -0

None of that even matters. That's not even the point. Racism is a "disease" that can never be cured. There is no cure. There never will be a cure. That's the whole point. Create a "disease" that can't be cured, and use that to punish your enemies with. Ergo, you have a weapon that will always be useful for whatever it is you need to accomplish.

How do you know there's no cure? Because, it's been with us since the dawn of time, and thousands of years later, it's still here.

0
UnemployedMarx [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

There is a cure for it. Ethnocentric society that never allows racial division to breed. That's the cure.

1
TwistedSister 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's a fairy tale. The greatest wars in history were the same people fighting their own brothers.

0
UnemployedMarx [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

True, there's more to it all than race but race is still a factor. Name me one war in history where a multicultural state fought together? The Romans effectively lost their country because they had too many foreigners enlisted in their military.

I agree that brothers often fight each other and that happens with actual brothers by blood too but ultimately you are much closer to your brother than you are a foreigner.

1
TwistedSister 1 point ago +1 / -0

Name me one war in history where a multicultural state fought together....

WWI, WWII, India, China.....just off the top of my head...

0
UnemployedMarx [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

I meant it more like the actual State itself. Not alliances. The Japanese didn't fight the war because they loved Germans. They fought for Japan's interest and they were Japanese not a multicultural State.

1
TwistedSister 1 point ago +1 / -0

Black people actually fought alongside white people for America in both WWI and WWII.....shocking, right?

0
UnemployedMarx [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ethnicity is not only skin colour but those black people were perhaps American in identity. The reasons they fought can be argued. Historically dominant races did use people of different races in their armies but the dominant race still had authority. The leftist black people today are a different ethnicity than many of us.