773
Comments (86)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
58
dominickmilford 58 points ago +64 / -6

I don't think Trump wanted to break up the country or deal with the incredible fallout that would have come with it. It was never going to be a reasonable measure to push the military into this, not without a full exposure of the fraud to the people in a large scale way. SCOTUS really fucked us all.

58
TexasPiper 58 points ago +64 / -6

That is an inexcusable cop-out. It might have been nasty but now we are fucked for certain.

45
Shitmoths 45 points ago +46 / -1

I explained it to my wife like this: being fat is hard, being fit is hard, choose your hard. In relation to our current situation: causing a major rift (with possible civil war) in our society in order to reorganize our government to represent the will of the people is hard, living under authoritarian, globalist, identitarian government is not only hard, but also antithetical to our shared morals and the American way of life. It shouldn't have even been a difficult decision.

24
TexasPiper 24 points ago +26 / -2

Especially when you consider there are literally millions of people who want the same thing. They were (and still are) willing to fight for it. They just needed a leader to say “go”. Unfortunately Trump was not that leader.

12
logan34 12 points ago +13 / -1

That Leader will Rise. Trump didnt step into office thinking he would lead a legit revolution with the army he was a businessman who wanted to bring back American prosperity.

8
maga_maga_man 8 points ago +8 / -0

He needed to lose, to expose the truth, and perhaps people take action. Otherwise people would have kept seeing him as some Superman that would handle it for us.

6
FullAutoFlintlock 6 points ago +6 / -0

too many (((voices))) from his kids and advisors. sold him out to some plan

8
pinchitony 8 points ago +8 / -0

Except when you are working out to stop being fat there's not some weird Iraqis dumbasses and a freaking North Korean wacko waiting to nuke your ass while you deal with a Civil War.

5
strictly1957 5 points ago +5 / -0

Superbly stated in everyman terms! Respect for those analogies! Totally agree...

5
ProudlyConservative 5 points ago +5 / -0

We're already on our way to Marxism. We can't keep backing off and letting this seep through because soon there'll be no going back.

14
Frog_Prince 14 points ago +15 / -1

Not necessarily.

It is very important to remember, the Dems ALWAYS fuck it up in the end and start infighting.

This, combined with an eventually slip on the cheating is inevitable. It is a matter of how much damage they can do in the meantime, and if we can organize to take over again but with a real MAGA team, not just one solo man.

8
Gadsden 8 points ago +8 / -0

Except the in-fighting will be between old guard dems that want to chest the American people out of their money and maintain the status quo and new dems that are full blown communists that actually believe in the ideology and are young enough to understand modern influencing of the people.

Which side do you think will win over the next decade?

5
aaafirefly123 5 points ago +5 / -0

The Establishment.

They don’t want real socialism, they want Corporate Socialism in which the elite get richer at the expense of everyone else.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
8
TexasPiper 8 points ago +8 / -0

Agreed

3
pinchitony 3 points ago +4 / -1

No, it wouldn't be "nasty", "nasty" would be awesome…it would be inevitable doom. A Civil War in the US right now would invite WWIII and nuclear attacks when the acting president gets compromised by the other side.

1
feelips 1 point ago +1 / -0

Live free or die!

6
rabdargab 6 points ago +7 / -1

Thats such BS. I am not bashing Trump at all, but this "well it would be bad or messy" argument is BS. The nation was handed to an usurper plain and simple, and everyone involved, good or bad, will have to live with that choice and the consequences that come with it for the rest of their lives. If we were a nation that had stayed isolationist, then I would share you sentiment, but we proudly send our troops to war constantly, under BS pretexts and are told we must support it or we arnt Patriotic. We only have the luxury of making these platitudinous cop out statements because we have not yet fully savored the fruits of the tyrants labor.

-8
deleted -8 points ago +7 / -15
17
hlecter 17 points ago +18 / -1

The presidential election is a shared concern of all the states because the president affects all of them. The SCOTUS rational for evading the case was entirely political. They are the law now so they can justify it with whatever legalese they want though.

9
logan34 9 points ago +9 / -0

They literally admit it was because they were scared of antifa riots. Gtfo here total cop out.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
5
dixond 5 points ago +5 / -0

Each state is guaranteed the right to administer their own elections.

UNDER RULES ESTABLISHED BY THEIR LEGISLATURES

The entire point of the lawsuit was that those states didn't execute their elections under rules established by their legislatures.

The fact that they were allowed to get away with it renders the Constitution null and void.

FACTS

2
jpower 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree that it shouldn't have been the case that went to the Supreme Court, but the SC had a few other cases that it could easily have ruled on.

IMO, they therefore cucked out since there was at least one option for them to rule on at a given time throughout this whole fuckery.

2
ProudlyConservative 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are political & compromised.