flynn? do you realize that one of the main jobs of a general is to assess plans of action, and pick which is the best one, which involves seeing the flaws, seeing the weaknesses, and even understanding how each plan CAN fail, because all plans CAN fail? and do you remember that on the 5th flynn said that trump, 10 out of 10, WOULD remain president?
so that guy, supposedly saw some kind of plan, and was 10 out of 10 sure it would work. what kind of person is ever that certain that there's ZERO chance a plan can fail? and how did that person ever get to be a general in the first place? shouldn't that almost scare you? that he was that monumentally WRONG and was actually a general?
He was on unfamiliar territory, I assume. He has military training and experience, and experience of military politics, but the D.C. version runs presumably on different rules.
Being even a genius in one profession does not make one a genius in everything. Quite often they may stumble worse than somebody who is a noob because they may assume they can figure out what is going on, based on how they have done in their specialty field, while actually being completely off the mark because they just don't understand what they are dealing with now.
this is about judgement. pure and simple. it's real easy and basic.
you either have good judgement or you don't.
if anyone EVER, EVER tries to tell me that some plan they're working on or know about is 100% foolproof, 10 out of 10 guarantee, i'll know right away that person is a fool and has bad judgement. there's no such thing as a foolproof plan. and a fucking general should know that. his job was dealing with plans and knowing how they CAN fail, because all plans can fail. as a general he should've known that. this is all very simple basic logic here, there's no middle ground or room for disagreement. he literally said the plan CANNOT FAIL. and he was monumentally WRONG.
he could've simply said 'trump has a plan and i think it's a good one'. or hell, the very absolute bare minimum LEAST he could've done was say he was 9 out of 10. which still leaves open some possibility for failure.
it's when you go making promises to people that you can't keep, that's when you're a fuckup. you say 'i'll try my best' or 'i think it will work out', you never say it absolutely will, no chance it won't. and especially not when in reality, the chance of trump getting a 2nd term back on the 5th, THAT was the slim chance. but flynn flipped it around and said it was 10 out of 10! it was probably really more like .0001 out of 10! i mean you can't possibly BE more wrong about anything than flynn was about that! just try!
Well, if the requirement was to see Trump in office. The only way was to have the whole country behind him. Which means he had to have a massive amount of confidence. Flynn was building the confidence.
having confidence that somehow trump will magically get to remain president, doesn't magically will it into happening. the entire country minus all the politicians in DC could've decided they supported trump now on the 5th, and it wouldn't matter. they already voted, and then the EC voted. sure there was fraud, but it was certified. the fraud was certified when the EC votes were, and then they were cast back in december. it was OVER at that point. you can't just undo that by 'having confidence'.
either pence was going to try to reject those EC votes or he wasn't, but flynn telling people trump was 10 out of 10 going to remain wouldn't affect that in any way shape or form.
Yes, that scares me - enough to unregister as a Republican. Those faggots are finished, but they won't notice until after they waste your vote for two more cycles.
Third party NOW, or it's commies as far as the eye can see, gang....
flynn? do you realize that one of the main jobs of a general is to assess plans of action, and pick which is the best one, which involves seeing the flaws, seeing the weaknesses, and even understanding how each plan CAN fail, because all plans CAN fail? and do you remember that on the 5th flynn said that trump, 10 out of 10, WOULD remain president?
so that guy, supposedly saw some kind of plan, and was 10 out of 10 sure it would work. what kind of person is ever that certain that there's ZERO chance a plan can fail? and how did that person ever get to be a general in the first place? shouldn't that almost scare you? that he was that monumentally WRONG and was actually a general?
He was on unfamiliar territory, I assume. He has military training and experience, and experience of military politics, but the D.C. version runs presumably on different rules.
Being even a genius in one profession does not make one a genius in everything. Quite often they may stumble worse than somebody who is a noob because they may assume they can figure out what is going on, based on how they have done in their specialty field, while actually being completely off the mark because they just don't understand what they are dealing with now.
lol no.
this is about judgement. pure and simple. it's real easy and basic.
you either have good judgement or you don't.
if anyone EVER, EVER tries to tell me that some plan they're working on or know about is 100% foolproof, 10 out of 10 guarantee, i'll know right away that person is a fool and has bad judgement. there's no such thing as a foolproof plan. and a fucking general should know that. his job was dealing with plans and knowing how they CAN fail, because all plans can fail. as a general he should've known that. this is all very simple basic logic here, there's no middle ground or room for disagreement. he literally said the plan CANNOT FAIL. and he was monumentally WRONG.
he could've simply said 'trump has a plan and i think it's a good one'. or hell, the very absolute bare minimum LEAST he could've done was say he was 9 out of 10. which still leaves open some possibility for failure.
it's when you go making promises to people that you can't keep, that's when you're a fuckup. you say 'i'll try my best' or 'i think it will work out', you never say it absolutely will, no chance it won't. and especially not when in reality, the chance of trump getting a 2nd term back on the 5th, THAT was the slim chance. but flynn flipped it around and said it was 10 out of 10! it was probably really more like .0001 out of 10! i mean you can't possibly BE more wrong about anything than flynn was about that! just try!
"No plan survives contact with the enemy."
Shouldn't every military leader know that?
You’re absolutely 100% correct. 10 out of 10. Would read again.
No plan survives first contact with the enemy ~~~ or as Tyson put it everybody's got a plan till they get punched in the face.
Flynn took a Qanon oath, let that sink in and that should answer your question.
did he actually take some kind of oath to q-anon or something? i think i've seen that said but i must've missed whatever happened there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XE-uBCT4i6g
That’s an oath to the c i a. Pretty much says it all.
Well, if the requirement was to see Trump in office. The only way was to have the whole country behind him. Which means he had to have a massive amount of confidence. Flynn was building the confidence.
Maybe?
having confidence that somehow trump will magically get to remain president, doesn't magically will it into happening. the entire country minus all the politicians in DC could've decided they supported trump now on the 5th, and it wouldn't matter. they already voted, and then the EC voted. sure there was fraud, but it was certified. the fraud was certified when the EC votes were, and then they were cast back in december. it was OVER at that point. you can't just undo that by 'having confidence'.
either pence was going to try to reject those EC votes or he wasn't, but flynn telling people trump was 10 out of 10 going to remain wouldn't affect that in any way shape or form.
Yes, that scares me - enough to unregister as a Republican. Those faggots are finished, but they won't notice until after they waste your vote for two more cycles.
Third party NOW, or it's commies as far as the eye can see, gang....