4768
Mic drop! (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by Scrub_Anon ago by Scrub_Anon +4769 / -1
Comments (177)
sorted by:
304
Brickapede2 304 points ago +306 / -2

2A is the supreme law. Some statute calling for mandatory buybacks violates this. His hypothetical is nonsense.

100
Speechify 100 points ago +100 / -0

Molon. Labe.

57
PropagandaWizard1984 57 points ago +57 / -0

No step on snek!

31
Hanging_Chad 31 points ago +31 / -0

Snek can't breathe!

21
FuckU/Spez 21 points ago +21 / -0

GeorgeFloyd Snek?

20
GulagInmate1776 20 points ago +20 / -0

Fentanyl snek too high for breathe

13
WikkiWikki420 13 points ago +13 / -0

I cunt breathe.

10
TangerineShine 10 points ago +10 / -0

snek sober now

7
Hanging_Chad 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yesss

19
Sleepyboy14 19 points ago +19 / -0

Don't Trend On Me.

5
molonlabe9 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yessir?

2
trollkin0331 2 points ago +2 / -0

Send bachelors. Get banned from reddit.

64
Trump__Supporter 64 points ago +64 / -0

If you make a law that violates the supreme law, you're violating the law.
Law abiding citizens don't have to follow things that go against the law.
Everyone with guns is following the law, namely "shall not be infringed".

We need a couple of 2A Sanctuary States. ALL ARMS ALLOWED.

50
DIARRHEA_FIGHT 50 points ago +50 / -0

We need a couple of 2A Sanctuary States

I don't like that idea.

We need 50 2A sanctuary states

9
Wtf_socialismreally 9 points ago +9 / -0

Consider the size of the standing army of a state that has a sanctuary for gun ownership though

8
GulagInmate1776 8 points ago +8 / -0

It would be yuuuuuuuuuuuge!

2
KingSweyn 2 points ago +2 / -0

NO STANDING ARMIES

The founders were explicit.

13
davidmode 13 points ago +13 / -0

Civilians should be allowed to buy full-auto

Change my mind

Edit: without having to go thru a special process

16
MR__K 16 points ago +16 / -0

as a criminal i object i dont like the idea of normal people being able to protect there homes.

11
CashMAGA 11 points ago +11 / -0

Abolish the NFA, abolish the GCA of 1968, abolish ALL GUN CONTROL LEGISLATION.

Shall not be infringed is not ambiguous wording!

5
Trump__Supporter 5 points ago +5 / -0

The only process they should have to go through is the one where, when you buy something, you have to exchange legal tender or something of value, as agreed by both parties. Aka, buying stuff.

5
TakenusernameA 5 points ago +5 / -0

No. We should be able to own this

4
HowManyLumpsDoYaWant 4 points ago +4 / -0

My new mindset is, if I don’t need an ID to vote, then I don’t need an ID to buy a gun.

3
KingSweyn 3 points ago +3 / -0

The National Firearms Act of 1930 is blatantly, unapologetically unconstitutional. It is the very definition of "infringed": violated at the edges.

We are not a country of laws, but of men. "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." - Voltaire

Voltaire had some extremely non-PC ideas. He wasn't talking of a general principle, but a specific group. And I, the same.

27
President_Elect_Pepe 27 points ago +27 / -0

This is the answer.

And that’s what his comment is really about.

He wants to change the premise of the argument so that you ignore this.

5
Sandersballistics 5 points ago +5 / -0

Glowie mode: they better bring at least two body bags!

3
slammervic2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly

177
RubyFurie 177 points ago +177 / -0

I can't sell my guns to the government they would fail a background check.

69
yudsfpbc 69 points ago +69 / -0

I'm looking for the amendment that says government can have guns, but I'm having a hard time finding it. Perhaps you can help? Where does it say government can have guns?

Weird.

54
consumptiveballerina 54 points ago +54 / -0

Since we can interpret the Constitution any way we want now, I declare the government is constitutionally PROHIBITED from having guns. FBI, when you read this, turn in your guns to the nearest law-abiding private citizen.

8
MR__K 8 points ago +8 / -0

um actually i don't think it says they can have guns. armed forces better start handing them out.

23
OzarkianTrumper 23 points ago +23 / -0

UncleJoe and his KamelToe would BOTH fail a low level background check!

7
slammervic2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Oh man this is gold

96
WaitingOnTheDay 96 points ago +96 / -0

Gee, why do we have the second amendment? Oh yea, so we don't have to follow unconditional laws dickhead. That guy is a fucking idiot.

22
Bandanna1 22 points ago +22 / -0

NeW ROol 1: If ThE guBberMent saY yOu caN noT tALk dEN U cAnnOt TalK Or U BrakkIng thE Laws.

neW rool 2: IF GUbberment tEll you No GuN den u NOT GET Da Guns or You bad.

nEw rOol 3: If GunbRment want soldieRs Live @ Ur house iNstead Of WHITE hOuse (Sic, Diversity House) Dat Is Now OK.

-Signed(Stamped) lovingly,

JOE BIDEN

Edited and reviewed by Kamala XoXo

3
infeststation 3 points ago +3 / -0

🤣

5
A_Flappy_Civic 5 points ago +5 / -0

He's a CCP puppet not an idiot. Call them out.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
62
Belleoffreedom 62 points ago +62 / -0

People pushing unConstitutional laws are criminals.

4
KingSweyn 4 points ago +4 / -0

The entire government, then.

55
PizzaPrisoner 55 points ago +55 / -0

“The fact that you won’t let us trample on your rights is proof you shouldn’t have had those rights at all”. Your brain on leftism.

12
Psilocybik 12 points ago +13 / -1

(((Rubin)))

3
South_Florida_Guy 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yep

39
deleted 39 points ago +39 / -0
2
TravisRSCX 2 points ago +2 / -0

Honestly he had the whole world helping him across the finish line.

38
turdinthepunch 38 points ago +38 / -0

what the fuck is a "buy back"? I didn't buy my gun from the federal government... what am I.. ISIS?

7
D0NNIE_DARK0 7 points ago +7 / -0

Lol.

32
PropagandaWizard1984 32 points ago +32 / -0

Marbury Vs Madison would disagree. US Constitution is the highest law of the land. No law supersedes it nor can any law change it short of a ratified amendment. Please note a ratified amendment is not a law but now part of the US Constitution. Laws are only "lawful" if they abide by the US Constitution...this is literally the basis of why we have a country. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marbury_v._Madison

7
KingSweyn 7 points ago +7 / -0

Tell that to the national firearms act of 1930.

7
PropagandaWizard1984 7 points ago +7 / -0

This law is illegal. Sadly I have no power beyond shit posting on the internet.

The courts have made all sorts of loopholes to crawl through while fucking over the Constitution. Like police DUI checkpoints which violate the 4th Amendment. The court even admits it violates the 4th but claim it's ok because "public safety". Either they are inalienable rights or they are not. The courts claim they are not.

30
AnointedVisions 30 points ago +32 / -2

"Turn in your guns if you want to legally own guns"

Faggot fascist Democrat logic.

16
SpinShaitan 16 points ago +17 / -1

Oh my God. Mr. Rubinstein is exhibit A for stupidity. These are my countrymen? Sweet Jesus!

3
KingSweyn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains.

  • Thomas Jefferson
1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was Jefferson even more based than we thought?

15
Beat_to_Quarters 15 points ago +15 / -0

That's some gold medal circular logic. You can criminalize literally anything and then claim you're breaking the law.

13
PrussianShrooms 13 points ago +14 / -1

Rubin?

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.

5
Curlybill 5 points ago +6 / -1

I am Jack's rising blood pressure

11
Sir_Girth 11 points ago +11 / -0

The only reason they want our guns is because they want us to be defenseless when they come to round us up to put us into a “safe place” for “our protection”.

Will make it really easy to kill us en masse. Since they’ll control the “safe places”.

History repeats itself, and we are on that very same road. The one Rwanda went down, Germany went down, Bosnia went down, and Cambodia went down. Just to name a few.

Know. Your. History.

4
The_Patriot2021 4 points ago +4 / -0

People just like Rubin did it to the Ukrainians in the Holodomor.

11
ARfreedom 11 points ago +11 / -0

If what I was doing yesterday is protected by the Constitution, and you were a law making it illegal tomorrow when I haven't done anything different, then you're a treasonous cunt.

4
KingSweyn 4 points ago +4 / -0

The Constitution was ratified to defend the natural rights of mankind.

Not to define them.

2
ARfreedom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where did I say it defined them? I said the Constitution protected my Right, or at least the Founding Fathers intended it to protect them, but our modern govt officials are a bunch of Right violating cunts.

2
KingSweyn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Chill man. I'm not opposing or accusing, I'm contributing. A tangential add.

1
ARfreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

My bad, still getting used to the community that has a majority of users that appreciate the Constitution. The opposite of the reddit shit hole.

10
yudsfpbc 10 points ago +10 / -0

New rule: Politicians respect natural, God-given rights or we start looking for decent trees.

9
DeepStateDolt 9 points ago +9 / -0

The moral and intellectual superiority that these deranged leftists believe they obtain is dangerous to society. They're animals. The only thing they will understand is a fist and boot.

7
maga_gal 7 points ago +8 / -1

...said no revolutionary ever.

6
Moominz0 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'd rather die on my feet an American than on my knees a slave. Even when the Chinese pick me apart with their chopsticks I want to be fighting the whole time. If they have to hold me down I'd spit in their goddamn faces if I were able. I might be a human shield for more able bodied patriots to use, but I'd be a human shield dual wielding my guns.

6
minotaurbeach 6 points ago +6 / -0

That only applies to the corporation, and not our country.

Just like giving millions of dollars away, we don't have. Our money is not backed by gold, just by the promise of my future labor. Last time I checked, businesses can't sell the promise of my labor to other countries without my consent. That breaks our emancipation law. The US is broke, no money, but the Democrats still are trading with other countries like we are slaves.

6
MasterOfIllusions 6 points ago +6 / -0

Old rule: government without the consent of the governed is not worth obeying.

6
BeepBoopComrades 6 points ago +7 / -1

Rubin, huh? Interesting.

5
Alpha_plus 5 points ago +5 / -0

The constitution is the law. Such backwards logic to justify tyranny.

1
KingSweyn 1 point ago +1 / -0

The true law, which needs no government, is "don't piss off the unified men with guns."

5
zooty 5 points ago +5 / -0

You can't call yourself a law abiding gun owner if your response to a confiscation (to call a spade a spade) is to submit because then you won't be a gun owner.

5
Barthaneous 5 points ago +5 / -0

SHALL NOT BE INFRIGNED MOTHA FUCKA.. I said this in Samuel Jacksons voice.

5
kogar 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Mandatory buyback." I love how they find different words for "confiscation."

Well, come get them. I'm in Texas.

3
KingSweyn 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is also an opportunity. Do you know how cheap you can make cheap muskets? I'd build dozens and take ALL the money.

5
John_Smallberries 5 points ago +6 / -1

Tiny hatters sure can’t wait to get us loaded up on trains.

5
ngc6086 5 points ago +5 / -0

Them: How much did you pay to buy your gun? Me: $7000 Them: We will give you $200 Me: I paid $7000. I want 100 Million... Them: It's not worth that. Me: My life is.

4
bigdaddy2 4 points ago +4 / -0

(((rubin)))

every fucking time.

4
Those_Who_Wander 4 points ago +4 / -0

The constitution is the law "Shall not be infringed." Anyone wanting to take your gun is breaking the law, NOT YOU!

4
Sierra_echo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nice pilpul.

4
Ch138 4 points ago +4 / -0

I invite Gaythan G. Gaybin to personally come and take my modest arsenal.

4
Silencemennow 4 points ago +4 / -0

Suck my fat fucking dick with your "mandatory" violation of the supreme law of the land.

4
LessAndLessIronic 4 points ago +4 / -0

Jokes on him. I stopped calling myself a "law abiding" gun owner years ago. Now I am just a gun owner.

Fuck around and find out.

4
crazyjackel 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because it is the law is a horrible argument. It could be a law that you have to drop a brick on your child’s head two days after is born and I would not obey that law. Laws need to have moral imperatives behind them.

4
factsOverFeels 4 points ago +4 / -0

Do not quote laws to men with guns.

4
ObongoForPrison2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nathan Rubin is a faggot.

4
KeepingAmericaGreat 4 points ago +4 / -0

The Constitution doesn't allow buybacks of its enumerated Rights.

4
warhammr02 4 points ago +4 / -0

Any law which is repugnant to the constitution is null and void, therefore any law which infringes on my right to keep and bare arms is not a valid law and never will be.

3
Ez_mac 3 points ago +3 / -0

Probably a good thing I don’t know who this soy cuck is.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Gadsden 3 points ago +3 / -0

No joke. What a sack of shit.

3
Brulz_Lulz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jesus christ look at that kindergarten rhetoric. He basically leaves no room for anyone to be able to own a rifle without being branded a criminal. Fucking disingenuous faggot.

3
Dfalt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hey Nathan - Come and Get It

3
Silencemennow 3 points ago +3 / -0

Get your asses to Texas.

1
richgoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

Florida is based also, fren. No open carry but you know everyone is packing

2
Hades440 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shall not be infringed. That's the law.

2
beta-detector 2 points ago +2 / -0

"buyback"?

Fucking KEK!

I don't remember US Government selling to its citizens any firearms.

4
KingSweyn 4 points ago +4 / -0

They keep saying health care is a right, so they should get free healthcare.

Since gun ownership is a right, that means the government has to give all of us guns, right?

1
ViolettFem 1 point ago +1 / -0

Um... sounds about right but we all know that rules, principles, laws and standards never equally apply in the left's world.. it's all selective

2
Jaybone86 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fags Gonna Faggot.

2
richgoose 2 points ago +2 / -0

don't call me law abiding then.

Call me Constitutional Abider!!

2
chesswhilehigh 2 points ago +2 / -0

We are peaceful gun owners.

2
Skogin 2 points ago +2 / -0

POW