If you make a law that violates the supreme law, you're violating the law.
Law abiding citizens don't have to follow things that go against the law.
Everyone with guns is following the law, namely "shall not be infringed".
We need a couple of 2A Sanctuary States. ALL ARMS ALLOWED.
The only process they should have to go through is the one where, when you buy something, you have to exchange legal tender or something of value, as agreed by both parties. Aka, buying stuff.
If you make a law that violates the supreme law, you're violating the law.
Law abiding citizens don't have to follow things that go against the law.
Everyone with guns is following the law, namely "shall not be infringed".
We need a couple of 2A Sanctuary States. ALL ARMS ALLOWED.
I don't like that idea.
We need 50 2A sanctuary states
Consider the size of the standing army of a state that has a sanctuary for gun ownership though
It would be yuuuuuuuuuuuge!
NO STANDING ARMIES
The founders were explicit.
Civilians should be allowed to buy full-auto
Change my mind
Edit: without having to go thru a special process
as a criminal i object i dont like the idea of normal people being able to protect there homes.
Abolish the NFA, abolish the GCA of 1968, abolish ALL GUN CONTROL LEGISLATION.
Shall not be infringed is not ambiguous wording!
The only process they should have to go through is the one where, when you buy something, you have to exchange legal tender or something of value, as agreed by both parties. Aka, buying stuff.
No. We should be able to own this
My new mindset is, if I don’t need an ID to vote, then I don’t need an ID to buy a gun.
The National Firearms Act of 1930 is blatantly, unapologetically unconstitutional. It is the very definition of "infringed": violated at the edges.
We are not a country of laws, but of men. "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." - Voltaire
Voltaire had some extremely non-PC ideas. He wasn't talking of a general principle, but a specific group. And I, the same.