11
Comments (8)
sorted by:
2
RandomPanda 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like these posts where some claims to know who/what Q is that clearly don’t even understand the evidence provided. You really think people would buy into it with basic stuff like leaks? How about instead of hitting that post button, you actually look into it before literally proving you know nothing one sentence in.

1
pcpoet 1 point ago +1 / -0

my bet is that he has looked into it, I disagree with the guys conclusion . I have my own. I believe it was a psyops ran by some state actor like china, Brittan, Russia. Israel. I believe there is evidence that someone at twitter was monitoring Trumps post and then seconds after he posted would post 8chan a post that would be indictive of knowledge about Trumps post. and my bet is that I have spent more time monitoring this then you. I am retired with no wife or social life. I am a real life recluse and hermit. I have spent 3-4 hours a day the last 3 years going over posts, blogs, YouTube videos, bitchute video. I dont call people stupid for being sucked into it becouse it is easy to be taken in . especially if you have been black pilled and want hope. when I started monstering it I had a good idea what it was but not how dangerous it was. I even defended it when those who had no clue attributed lies to it. My bigest criticism of trump is that he tried to ignore it and cultivate its fallowers becouse they were his voters and he did not want to upset them. he should of disavowed knoledge of it 2 1/2 years ago.

I have dyslexia so I apologize for all grammar and typos becouse that seems to be the attacks I get when I poste rather then substance

1
RandomPanda 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q posts quoting Trump occurred before trump’s posts. There were some other proofs as well which required Trumps complicity. Ether Trump was involved or he would have had to stay on script for his tweets and live press conferences etc and his speech/tweet writer was involved with Q. And I don’t think trump sticks to scripts or let anyone else tweet for him

1
pcpoet 1 point ago +1 / -0

the tweet situation is what people do not understand. there is an explanation and it goes directly to the twitter tech team monitoring him as he composed the tweet. you can compose a tweet and have it sit forever in the app before you decide to post it. do a tweet cancel it before you post and it gets saved on the twitter server and it can be posted later this also means that the evidence of this would be on the server and would consist of postings from some one on twitters network to 8 Chan. there are also couple instances where I dont understand how the info that something was going to happen weird in a speech has gotten to 8 Chan on a Q post but just becouse you dont know how it happen does not mean there is not an explanation.. there are very few of theses proofs that I cant explain but if I am right it was a foreign spy agency they might have intelligence about the content of a trump speech but I agree this is a weak answer.

2
SwampSlayer39 2 points ago +2 / -0

As crazy as Q is- you can’t blame them. The Podesta emails on wikileaks clearly showed that he is a sex trafficker. Epstein got caught as a sex trafficker, and Biden sniffs young children on camera. Dr Phil has had people on his show to describe it, and Ted Gunderson flat out said it. The swamp is demonic and evil.

So what do you expect?

0
Liberty_Prime 0 points ago +1 / -1

I expect people who are playing fantasy football to realize they don't really own a quarterback after Trust Sessions.

2
Double_D 2 points ago +2 / -0

It turns out Durham and Huber don't exist?

Q or no Q, you will continue to be manipulated by people with agendas because, well, you sound like a fucking idiot and idiots are easy to manipulate.

1
Liberty_Prime 1 point ago +1 / -0

How are you pinning a psy op on the DOJ?

They're a bunch of lawyers.

Psy Ops are a different agency.