One of the things these “but muh Nazis literally Hitler” people completely fail to understand is that the NSDAP was extremely politically correct at the time and was actually the centrist party with 40% of the vote. It’s too difficult to imagine how politically correct all that shit was at the time and how people didn’t vote for some sort of obvious “right wing extremist” party, they voted based on political correctness and popularity and crap like that. Then people also fail to notice who had control of institutions.
So if someone wants to find the real threat of power seizure they’re going to have to look for stuff like what party controls academia, press, tech companies, bureaucracy, etc and what party is most politically correct according to those things. Then look for who is getting increasingly more extreme “progressive” in terms of whatever those things embrace as progressive.
The Ivy League specifically limits Asian students.
I realized the Ivy Leagues were evil institutions when the Asian American civil rights group sued them and Harvard et al's response was that they aren't really interested in education but rather, they are deliberately trying to create a global oligarchy in which every leaders in the world has to pass their commie propaganda curriculum to "earn" their place among the oligarchy. Of course, my words are a bit different than their words but it's the same basic idea. They literally said they "want every world leader to pass through their doors."
Nonsense. There’s no “demographic” ruling over people. There’s a collection of various elites in different demographics. The people who don’t support the ideology of the elites are getting accused of “multiracial whiteness” which is proof that elites are failing to control people by demographic.
Well I can see you've never traveled the free-est parts of the web.
Ms. Beltran is the author of that multiracial whiteness article, a professor at NYU, and shares her demographic with half of Harvard.
Literally all I have to do is teach you how to see them and you'll be agreeing with me in six months. That's why they hate free speech. Their flimsy disguises are absolutely necessary to retain power.
Weird, like something a dictator would do. How very odd. Yep.
But muh trump literally Hitler!
One of the things these “but muh Nazis literally Hitler” people completely fail to understand is that the NSDAP was extremely politically correct at the time and was actually the centrist party with 40% of the vote. It’s too difficult to imagine how politically correct all that shit was at the time and how people didn’t vote for some sort of obvious “right wing extremist” party, they voted based on political correctness and popularity and crap like that. Then people also fail to notice who had control of institutions.
So if someone wants to find the real threat of power seizure they’re going to have to look for stuff like what party controls academia, press, tech companies, bureaucracy, etc and what party is most politically correct according to those things. Then look for who is getting increasingly more extreme “progressive” in terms of whatever those things embrace as progressive.
The party doesn't control those institutions. The Democrat party is one more of the institutions controlled.
To find out who rules over you, look at the demographics of people accepted to Harvard.
And yale. But mostly harvard
Why does Clown College always come third?
Asians? They're 25%.
The Ivy League specifically limits Asian students.
I realized the Ivy Leagues were evil institutions when the Asian American civil rights group sued them and Harvard et al's response was that they aren't really interested in education but rather, they are deliberately trying to create a global oligarchy in which every leaders in the world has to pass their commie propaganda curriculum to "earn" their place among the oligarchy. Of course, my words are a bit different than their words but it's the same basic idea. They literally said they "want every world leader to pass through their doors."
Nonsense. There’s no “demographic” ruling over people. There’s a collection of various elites in different demographics. The people who don’t support the ideology of the elites are getting accused of “multiracial whiteness” which is proof that elites are failing to control people by demographic.
Well I can see you've never traveled the free-est parts of the web.
Ms. Beltran is the author of that multiracial whiteness article, a professor at NYU, and shares her demographic with half of Harvard.
Literally all I have to do is teach you how to see them and you'll be agreeing with me in six months. That's why they hate free speech. Their flimsy disguises are absolutely necessary to retain power.
What makes it even more odd is that his party controls both branches of Congress
Right!!
https://www.weforum.org/events
Your comment on this forum will most certainly stop him.