4887
Comments (266)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
42
NataliesFeet 42 points ago +42 / -0

I disagree. They've got the cheating locked up. They will never need mail in ballots to win ever again, because they will never allow another outsider to run against their candidate. Future elections will be the same sham they were before Trump.

22
FLIBS 22 points ago +22 / -0

^^^ This!! It's a left or right wing puppet again for every election going forward... They tried the "outsider" (or were forced to) they aren't going to let that happen again.

11
Cesare_Borgia 11 points ago +11 / -0

Agreed. Every now and then they'll allow a Rommney type to win. Just to keep us placated.

2
mav2468 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nikki Haley 2024 or 2028!

6
side_o_beef 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think they see their failure mainly as the RNC in 2016. Remember that Trump wasn't supposed to get the nomination. Somehow he did. Then they thought they had cheating locked up. Oops, Trump did a little bit better than they expected him to. Now they will make sure that kind of thing never happens again.

3
GlobalUnity 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, they still need the cover and the ruse of the process.

We really should be expending a bunch of effort on forcing states to improve their audit trail and validation of voting by some immutable (cannot be changed) process and retention of data in a certified manner.

We should start an effort to get the best minds on developing an iron clad process that addresses all the means of voting fraud we witnessed they used this time.

Is anyone aware of a central location where all that is listed and documented? I would like to start evaluating things and at least identifying all the different methods and manners in which they defrauded the voter.

We have to remember that includes immigration in general. Every single voter that every president makes a "citizen", is essentially voter fraud that disenfranchises an American. We at least need compensatory vote weights for historical voters that are weighted based on the number of immigrants and even general population growth that has occurred. For example, someone like me who can trace their family back to the creation of the USA, a real Native American, should have the greatest weight in voting, over someone like some immigrant that was just made a "citizen" last year.

2
NataliesFeet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Citizen

Voter ID

Property owner

Male

1
Fabius 1 point ago +1 / -0

white