8106
posted ago by Doggos [M] ago by Doggos +8116 / -10

We're moving on from the rebranding situation. We don't want to leave all three posts stickied, but feel that they are still important, so this thread will highlight them all.


Excerpt from the initial announcement

Today is a big day - after five years, The Donald has rebranded to Patriots.win.

The first reason goes without saying... we're in a period of transition with yesterday's fraudulent inauguration. It will likely be some time before Trump gets back to actively communicating with his base, but we intend to do what we can to keep our part of this movement as active as ever.

We're not turning against Trump - not at all, our branding and our rules will remain the same for the immediate future. If Trump moves forward with the rumored Patriots Party, then we're perfectly positioned to fully support him in that endeavor.

It is our duty to step up and call out the disaster that this administration will be.

This rebrand does not indicate a change in moderation policy.


Help Patriots find their lost home

Unfortunately, the old domain got redirected to Gab and then to localhost, in response to our rebranding.

The good news is that we've retained at least 75% of our traffic, but it's still incredibly important to share the site with family and friends, and on any other social media platforms that you're a part of.


AMA about the situation

We also held an AMA about the situation, to address the concerns that users initially had. It is probably easiest to go to my profile as well as u/shadowman3001's, and read our responses directly from there.


We don't expect to get the old domain back, but we're moving on past this situation as this negativity helps no one.

Of course, if the old domain does come back in any form other than the redirect to here, it's not at all managed by our team, and we would suggest not taking part in it.

Thanks for putting up with all the bullshit, time to return to MAGA.

Comments (906)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
independentbystander 1 point ago +1 / -0

I never said it wasn't, it's definitely the right thing to do. I'm just saying that based on previous cases in US politics, it did not go well for most who try that route. Also, as I said we can't really go by historical evidence, because a third-party headed by President Trump would obviously bring in much more support right away than a less-known group like the "Green Party" or Libertarians can draw with a guy like "What is an Aleppo" or even a more-recognizable Ross Perot/Ron Paul-style of candidate.

But a Patriot Party, with Trump at the helm? Oh yes, I'm in! Win, lose, whatever, when GEOTUS talks, I listen (as I have since 1980 or so.)