Mostly in the directional choices like music and editing. Not the effects. Was more corny than scary leading up to the climax. If it were made today, I think it would be filmed differently. I know there was a remake within the last ten years but I don't remember much about it and it didn't get very good reviews.
I actually kind of despise the way movies are filmed today. Too visceral. I wish we could go back to movies just being movies instead being all hung up on how "realistic" they look and feel. Anyway that's just my take.
Totally depends on the movie. There's no right or wrong way. 1917 is what it is because of that visceral filming, Dr. Strangelove is a war movie that is what it is because it takes a serious subject matter but makes it kind of "feel" like a production.
I didn't see anything in the production that particularly showed the age egregiously. It's mostly atmospheric, not too many special effects.
Mostly in the directional choices like music and editing. Not the effects. Was more corny than scary leading up to the climax. If it were made today, I think it would be filmed differently. I know there was a remake within the last ten years but I don't remember much about it and it didn't get very good reviews.
I actually kind of despise the way movies are filmed today. Too visceral. I wish we could go back to movies just being movies instead being all hung up on how "realistic" they look and feel. Anyway that's just my take.
Totally depends on the movie. There's no right or wrong way. 1917 is what it is because of that visceral filming, Dr. Strangelove is a war movie that is what it is because it takes a serious subject matter but makes it kind of "feel" like a production.