10
posted ago by PresidentErectHunter +10 / -0

I don't believe it. They just look goofy. Why can't hearing impaired people just watch video and read the captions?

Comments (28)
sorted by:
4
DeafPede 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, I'm just speaking as a deaf person, the closed captions are not always accurate, and I hate to say, not a lot of deaf people can understand the closed captions and get confused easily so they rely on interpreters more than actual closed captions.

It's pretty embarrassing, ngl. I prefer closed captions over interpreter, but you know, whatever.

0
PresidentErectHunter [S] 0 points ago +2 / -2

Wrong. There is no way a sign language person is more accurate than closed captioning.

Impossible.

There is no urgent need to see it in real time

Just watch it on 30 second delay and read the captioning.

Problem solved. The rest of us won't have to see the goofy guy signing on the TV screen and trying to decipher the Xiden babble.

2
DeafPede 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am just saying what OTHER deaf people told me why they rely on sign language/interpreter rather than Closed captions. I personally prefer closed captions over interpreter anyways because they can always change words around that what are not actually being said in conversation. Again. I'm just saying what OTHER deaf people told me why they prefer interpreter over closed captions.

I attended school with other deaf kids, and I've seen them completely stunned over what was said in text, and misunderstood themselves so fucking easy. They can't read, or let alone really understand what is really saying.

-1
PresidentErectHunter [S] -1 points ago +1 / -2

But if the video is delayed 60 seconds, the captions are very accurately transcribed, correct?

Is there any reason deaf people need it in real time and cannot wait a few seconds.

2
DeafPede 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not about "in real time" they understand things better through sign language/interpreter than reading the text. That's the point I'm trying to say.

They don't care about keep up with real time conversation, it's about understanding better rather than get confused what they're saying via CC.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
DeafPede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I stopped caring, and plus, I can't take him seriously with his username after all.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
PresidentErectHunter [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Don't recall Trump using these goofy sign language people.

Why is it necessary for Xoe Xiden?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
DeafPede 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've already seen Trump's live videos with interpreters before, so I can confirm that he already have done that.

0
PresidentErectHunter [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Outstanding. This is why we love Trump. Refused to use the goofy sign language guy.

And how did the deaf people make do? They must have waited 60 seconds for the delayed video and read the captioning, which is far more accurate than signing anyway.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
PresidentErectHunter [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nonsense! You are being silly. Wait 60 seconds for the captions to be transcribed accurately. Wait a few seconds for the original words. A court transcriptionist is deadly accurate. Hire a transcriptonist for TV instead of these signing people.

That way the rest of us will not have to be subjected to a guy waving his hands around and pretending he is actually conveying accurate meaningful info to anybody.

Thankfully Trump did not allow this nonsense.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
0
PresidentErectHunter [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sorry, but the original words of the English language will ALWAYS be superior to somebody's sign language interpretation.

How does anyone not comprehend this?

We are doing the deaf pedes a favor by sparing them the second hand interpretation and providing them the actual words a few seconds later. Words that they can read for themselves instead of having it interpreted for them.

Demanding it in real time is childish and inaccurate. Wait a few seconds and get it accurately straight from the source.

1
Nowanoutlaw 1 point ago +1 / -0

When bidens translater turns around and drops their pants and takes a dump you will know that they are for real. Translation: what a load of shit.

1
Salt-N-Pepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those are for the blind

1
imintheway 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hank Johnson told me it was because they are blind and can't read the captions.

0
FlyinHeadlock 0 points ago +2 / -2

Been saying this since day one. We don't use this for anything else. Just propaganda campaigns by gov and religions. They learned this from corrupt evangelists from the 80's. Used the disabled to create a sympathetic softer look and feel to rape the shit out of people.

-1
PresidentErectHunter [S] -1 points ago +1 / -2

They can watch it on 30 second delay and read every word. Accurately.

They need to watch it in real time with some sign guy struggling with Xiden babble??

They can't wait 30 seconds? Ridiculous.

0
muddobber 0 points ago +1 / -1

This sign language is 90% fake. Gov. mandated to have some idiot standing flopping their hands around like a trained monkey. Indians did a better job. UGG-HOW and SMOKE SIGNALS.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
muddobber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can they do it in Mexican, Chinese, Arab, Russian ? Seems they should. We have a lot of these people in US. Have 5 or 6 nuts standing on stage flopping around looking like trained monkeys..