26
posted ago by pinchitony +26 / -0

…Change my mind.

They want that word out of your vocabulary. They want you to think it’s a “terrorist” word, when it’s a perfectly legal claim.

…Change my mind. They want that word out of your vocabulary. They want you to think it’s a “terrorist” word, when it’s a perfectly legal claim.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
2
Brandidh 2 points ago +2 / -0

But yes!

2
wdang 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are you suggesting BIDEN is a FRAUDULENT PRESIDENT? That's an interesting take, let's see what the FRAUDULENT NEWS says about this FRAUDULENT PRESIDENCY that you speak of

1
pinchitony [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

exactly

1
Brandidh 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ha ha for a minute I thought you said Frau biden

1
Tiessa 1 point ago +1 / -0

I completely agree.

1
muddobber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Criminals in the China House.

0
TwistedSister 0 points ago +1 / -1

Or President Xi, either one works.

1
pinchitony [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, FRAUD. Fraud is what they clearly did.

You don’t call a criminal his partner in crime name, you call him CRIMINAL. And in this case the crime is FRAUD.

0
TwistedSister 0 points ago +1 / -1

I understand your passion, but President Xi shows who's really in charge.

1
pinchitony [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t give a fuck if Galactus is in fucking charge, they commit FRAUD and they are accountable to fraud.

0
TwistedSister 0 points ago +1 / -1

Cool. Other people can have a different opinion. I respect your right to believe differently.