Option 1: He presents an honest accounting of what happened during Spygate, and recommends indictments. He is summarily fired by whomever is now the Attorney General, as Democrats don't give a flying fuck about firing special counsels. Nothing ends up happening.
Option 2: He white washes the crimes and recommends no indictments. The criminals currently in charge get away scot free. Democrats and Deep State crow about how this was a big nothing burger. Nothing ends up happening.
Actually, this is something to watch for in the upcoming confirmation hearing for attorney general nominee, Merick Garland. Im guessing some senator will ask if will commit to not removing the Special Counsel.
Option 1: He presents an honest accounting of what happened during Spygate, and recommends indictments. He is summarily fired by whomever is now the Attorney General, as Democrats don't give a flying fuck about firing special counsels. Nothing ends up happening.
Option 2: He white washes the crimes and recommends no indictments. The criminals currently in charge get away scot free. Democrats and Deep State crow about how this was a big nothing burger. Nothing ends up happening.
Pick 1 of the options above. That's where we are.
Actually, this is something to watch for in the upcoming confirmation hearing for attorney general nominee, Merick Garland. Im guessing some senator will ask if will commit to not removing the Special Counsel.