Sigh. A blanket ban on speech in a public forum may be allowable under certain circumstances, and is held to a lower level of judicial scrutiny than a viewpoint-based ban.
If you don’t grok 1A law, don’t worry about it. As I said, it’s a legal distinction.
I mean I understand, but it really leaves a bad impression on people that on the Joe Biden Channel and The White House channel no speech is allowed. I'm getting North Korea vibes.
Maybe. A blanket ban is different than targeting individual users, which could be construed as viewpoint-based censorship.
Not saying I agree with the foregoing, just that it is a legal distinction that could be material.
The court argued that its a public forum, thus, Trump was not allowed to ban
Sigh. A blanket ban on speech in a public forum may be allowable under certain circumstances, and is held to a lower level of judicial scrutiny than a viewpoint-based ban.
If you don’t grok 1A law, don’t worry about it. As I said, it’s a legal distinction.
I mean I understand, but it really leaves a bad impression on people that on the Joe Biden Channel and The White House channel no speech is allowed. I'm getting North Korea vibes.
Yeah, it’s shitty. And perhaps a court would rule it is unconstitutional. But it is not the same fact pattern as the Twitter account case.