15
Comments (31)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
TwistedSister 3 points ago +6 / -3

So you're saying he should have declared civil war instead? With what army? You?

3
Top_Patriot [S] 3 points ago +5 / -2

He was the commander and chief of the military. Now Biden is the commander and chief so that option is now gone.

5
Sigma 5 points ago +5 / -0

It’s “commander-in-chief”, and i agree with you.

A movement is only effective when it moves with its leader, and when the leader leads effectively. However, there are a lot of other variables to this equation that we don’t know about. But still, i think he made the wrong call.

0
TwistedSister 0 points ago +3 / -3

Answer the question, please. Did you want him to declare civil war? yes or no?

1
Top_Patriot [S] 1 point ago +3 / -2

I don't see it as a civil war, but I guess the answer is yes.

1
Nowsthetime 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not surprised. You joined a day ago, probably a Leftist missing us on Twitter. You guys always come back.

-1
TwistedSister -1 points ago +1 / -2

If you prevented biden from taking the WH, it means civil war.

So what's stopping you from declaring civil war? A lone guerilla can take out entire states at a time....