Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
The journalistic integrity of this article can be seen in how it dances around the Mueller investigation as if Mueller’s efforts were anything but a discraceful and farcical use of state power.
If the reporter can’t help but present that in the most false light possible, you can’t trust any other portrayal he spews.
Bonus example: he uses a single-word “quote” to falsely imply that President Trump was calling all Mexicans rapists, another lazy media lie one can easily debunk for themselves by simply watching or reading the actual speech in context, rather than blindly trusting hacks like this doofus.
You joined 1 day ago and you're posting a shitty hit piece from Vanity Fair (LOL) and trying to argue that it's credible? The author makes it very clear he hates Trump, doesn't even try to pretend the article is based on true, unbiased journalism. He references the Russian collusion situation multiple times as though it were true, never once mentions that the declassified documents have definitively revealed that it was all a lie. And just because he claims they wore lapel mics doesn't make it true (seriously? you really are naive). The media lies constantly now, you can't believe much of what they put out, and VF is garbage.
Yea vanity fair hard no.
The journalistic integrity of this article can be seen in how it dances around the Mueller investigation as if Mueller’s efforts were anything but a discraceful and farcical use of state power.
If the reporter can’t help but present that in the most false light possible, you can’t trust any other portrayal he spews.
Bonus example: he uses a single-word “quote” to falsely imply that President Trump was calling all Mexicans rapists, another lazy media lie one can easily debunk for themselves by simply watching or reading the actual speech in context, rather than blindly trusting hacks like this doofus.
Whyte supreshshesh
I mean, it has verbatim quotes and says that Miller, Patel, and Cohen had actual lapel mics on and everything was on the record.
Have any of them disputed anything in this?
They always do. That’s the problem. 7nless it’s under oath, don’t believe it.
You joined 1 day ago and you're posting a shitty hit piece from Vanity Fair (LOL) and trying to argue that it's credible? The author makes it very clear he hates Trump, doesn't even try to pretend the article is based on true, unbiased journalism. He references the Russian collusion situation multiple times as though it were true, never once mentions that the declassified documents have definitively revealed that it was all a lie. And just because he claims they wore lapel mics doesn't make it true (seriously? you really are naive). The media lies constantly now, you can't believe much of what they put out, and VF is garbage.