No, this is the weakest argument we can make. We can see on the security footage that Ruby loaded up official cases with ballots at around 10 PM and put them under the table when they were shutting down for the night.
I'm not convinced that these ballots were anything special. They stole the election in the adjudication process.
It's people like you that undermine our cause. Don't obsess over easily disprovable arguments. Look at the security footage, then come back and complain if they are faked.
To use your words, the more you refuse to look at the available evidence, the more I wonder why.
Why would they be seperated at all? Who says they're "official" suitcases? Why put them there while they were "shutting down" only to take them back out in the middle of the night with no observers?
They weren't "suitcases". Repeating that just undermines our argument. The ballots put in there were from the normal stacks the workers were working on in the room. We can see that from the security tapes.
And I don't know why the fuck we keep falling into stupid fabricated traps like screaming about "suitcases".
First, it's obvious that you moan about "suitcases" because you're trying to imply that they were sneaking ballots into the place inside of clandestine luggage. That's fucking wrong. The 'suitcases' are huge soft-sided cases and are official containers. Stressing 'suitcases' to put that doubt into people's minds just makes them think you're a liar when they learn the truth.
But more to the point, they don't even use these soft-sided containers in Georgia. They used huge rigid plastic bins with sliding lids. So even claiming 'oh it's like a suitcase' is fucking wrong. Those fabric cases were used in, I think, Michigan. Not Georgia.
So it's like you're lying twice.
The point I'm making is this: when you tell little lies constantly, even if you think they 'don't really matter', all it does is set you up to be easily discredited, and once someone can point out that you lied twice, they can claim that either you're a fucking imbecile who doesn't know what they're talking about and should be ignored, or they will claim you're a malicious liar and nothing you're talking about is to be believed.
I've hated this 'suitcases' shit and knew it was going to be latched onto by Boomers from the very second they trotted out that term.
Does the type of container really matter when the main point is, they said they were done counting for the night, kicked out observers, whipped out the containers from under the table and started counting unsupervised?
The type of container is irrelevant, they used that single issue to "debunk" the claim initially. Its the same argument "no Hillary didnt use a corrosive chemical to wipe her server"
"She deleted all evidence of what she did at work using a software, not a cloth. So anyone saying she destroyed evidence is lying. And it's illegal to ask for that evidence back."
There is another video where they are literally discussing the fraud and how much they are getting paid, 100 dollars an hour if I recall correctly. A whole pipeline worth of employees are out of work for a few hundred bucks.
suitcase or official ballot container doesnt change the fact they kicked the media and observers out by implying they were gonna leave and the kept count in violation of the law. Its not material or aggrivating on what the container is called. Evern if it was a literal suitcase but it was an official/certified ballot container it doesnt matter.
You mock it, but it's clinging onto stupid fucking outright lies like that that make you easily discredited and nobody will ever listen to you again.
The fucking cases in Georgia were solid rigid plastic bins with sliding lids, not even the soft-sided cases they used in Michigan. It's a complete and total lie and the only reason you would ever say they were 'suitcases' in Georgia is because you're dumber than hammered shit and don't even have the actual facts yourself, OR you are trying to intentionally instill doubts and make it sound like they were sneaking in ballots clandestinely, which is also a complete lie.
Either way, if you use 'suitcases', you've failed. You're either going to be ignored because you're ignorant, or you're going to be ignored because you're malicious.
You know why conservatives lose? Because we're fighting fight-generation information warfare and for some reason most of you dipshits cannot still get it through your heads that WORDS MATTER IN THIS BATTLEFIELD.
Not sure why this guy is being downvoted, he's correct. What seem like minor details to some because we know the overall truth of the matter will absolutely discredit you to people who do not already know this and when stated incorrectly are very damaging to the case for fraud.
When attempting to convince people you are correct you must use language that precisely describes the facts. Otherwise it’s an opening to cast doubt on your, the true, version of the events. Unless of course the intent is just preach to the quire in perpetuity.
I disagree, the left is dirty. Even if youre precise with your language they will add a qualifier to "debunk" you lol good example was Tim Pools comments about Epstein flight logs. Generally, I like to be precise with my language but precision doesnt change certain things. I like to lead with dismantling suitcase/ballot container argument and drop ths truth bomb that the observers had left and they fontinued counting. Everyone thought they were leaving. They he got a phone call to keep counting or possibly the all clear sign.
They will always find a technical loop hole or create one. Ex: when they claimed the vaccines would be bleach. That was never ever said in the conference ever.
Make no mistake, I'm not saying we target the left. Just the sheeple who only watch certain news outlets but aren't full left. When you engage this subset they will filter your information through MSDNC, Ben Shapiro and the like, so it's imperative our language doesn't leave an opening for misdirection.
For example "I watched Ben Shapiro, he said there were no suitcases and those were regulation bins and it wasn't voter fraud. The MAGA crowd can't tell the difference between a bin and a suitcase, they have no idea if there was any election fraud or not".
Otherwise yes, what you're saying is correct. Donald Trump won, by a lot.
Yeah, he's replied in this thread more than once, I just picked this particular thread to respond to. From what I saw earlier everywhere he replied he was down-voted, which was trend enough I just picked one and spoke up. You're right, in this instance sarcasm was missed.
SoS staff did a press conference about this the day after the phone call and he does a great job of dancing around the details. Never explains why counting continued without observers in violation of the law.
If you're looking for "suitcases" it's because there were none, OP is literally just lying. Georgia used rigid black plastic bins with sliding lids. There were no 'suitcases' or anything resembling them.
It should really be a permanent sticky. #1 thing anyone visiting this page should see
No, this is the weakest argument we can make. We can see on the security footage that Ruby loaded up official cases with ballots at around 10 PM and put them under the table when they were shutting down for the night. I'm not convinced that these ballots were anything special. They stole the election in the adjudication process.
They weren't "suitcases". That is easily debunked and makes the Left look good because they "proved" election fraud critics wrong.
Focus on the lie they told about the pipe.
They were filled at about 10 PM and then pulled out at around 11 PM.
Look at the security footage yourself. https://securevotega.com/factcheck/
Those boxes weren't how they stole the election. It was something else they did during that time.
It's people like you that undermine our cause. Don't obsess over easily disprovable arguments. Look at the security footage, then come back and complain if they are faked.
To use your words, the more you refuse to look at the available evidence, the more I wonder why.
Why would they be seperated at all? Who says they're "official" suitcases? Why put them there while they were "shutting down" only to take them back out in the middle of the night with no observers?
They weren't "suitcases". Repeating that just undermines our argument. The ballots put in there were from the normal stacks the workers were working on in the room. We can see that from the security tapes.
And I don't know why the fuck we keep falling into stupid fabricated traps like screaming about "suitcases".
First, it's obvious that you moan about "suitcases" because you're trying to imply that they were sneaking ballots into the place inside of clandestine luggage. That's fucking wrong. The 'suitcases' are huge soft-sided cases and are official containers. Stressing 'suitcases' to put that doubt into people's minds just makes them think you're a liar when they learn the truth.
But more to the point, they don't even use these soft-sided containers in Georgia. They used huge rigid plastic bins with sliding lids. So even claiming 'oh it's like a suitcase' is fucking wrong. Those fabric cases were used in, I think, Michigan. Not Georgia.
So it's like you're lying twice.
The point I'm making is this: when you tell little lies constantly, even if you think they 'don't really matter', all it does is set you up to be easily discredited, and once someone can point out that you lied twice, they can claim that either you're a fucking imbecile who doesn't know what they're talking about and should be ignored, or they will claim you're a malicious liar and nothing you're talking about is to be believed.
I've hated this 'suitcases' shit and knew it was going to be latched onto by Boomers from the very second they trotted out that term.
Does the type of container really matter when the main point is, they said they were done counting for the night, kicked out observers, whipped out the containers from under the table and started counting unsupervised?
The type of container is irrelevant, they used that single issue to "debunk" the claim initially. Its the same argument "no Hillary didnt use a corrosive chemical to wipe her server"
"She deleted all evidence of what she did at work using a software, not a cloth. So anyone saying she destroyed evidence is lying. And it's illegal to ask for that evidence back."
There is another video where they are literally discussing the fraud and how much they are getting paid, 100 dollars an hour if I recall correctly. A whole pipeline worth of employees are out of work for a few hundred bucks.
It's just one piece of the puzzle. Like you said.
suitcase or official ballot container doesnt change the fact they kicked the media and observers out by implying they were gonna leave and the kept count in violation of the law. Its not material or aggrivating on what the container is called. Evern if it was a literal suitcase but it was an official/certified ballot container it doesnt matter.
Exactly. The same thing seems to be happening with the BLM "Democrats used us" tweet posted yesterday.
Exactly. The fact checkers zero in on that point and then claim the whole this is debunked.
could be fake, I wouldnt rely on that. Thankyou masks for fucking that up
its time for us to do our thing
Lock and Load. Feed em commies bullets.
GA is so corrupt. How the fuck is Ruby and her two henchmen not arrested for fraud?
It'S BeEn DeBuNkEd
Fact Check- False
They weren’t suitcases. They were hard-sided Pelican cases, which aren’t used for luggage.
DEBOOOOOOOOOOONKED!
ThOsE wErEn'T sUiTcAsEs!!!
You mock it, but it's clinging onto stupid fucking outright lies like that that make you easily discredited and nobody will ever listen to you again.
The fucking cases in Georgia were solid rigid plastic bins with sliding lids, not even the soft-sided cases they used in Michigan. It's a complete and total lie and the only reason you would ever say they were 'suitcases' in Georgia is because you're dumber than hammered shit and don't even have the actual facts yourself, OR you are trying to intentionally instill doubts and make it sound like they were sneaking in ballots clandestinely, which is also a complete lie.
Either way, if you use 'suitcases', you've failed. You're either going to be ignored because you're ignorant, or you're going to be ignored because you're malicious.
You know why conservatives lose? Because we're fighting fight-generation information warfare and for some reason most of you dipshits cannot still get it through your heads that WORDS MATTER IN THIS BATTLEFIELD.
Not sure why this guy is being downvoted, he's correct. What seem like minor details to some because we know the overall truth of the matter will absolutely discredit you to people who do not already know this and when stated incorrectly are very damaging to the case for fraud.
Why does tbe type of container matter when its the actions they took with it that are damning?
When attempting to convince people you are correct you must use language that precisely describes the facts. Otherwise it’s an opening to cast doubt on your, the true, version of the events. Unless of course the intent is just preach to the quire in perpetuity.
I disagree, the left is dirty. Even if youre precise with your language they will add a qualifier to "debunk" you lol good example was Tim Pools comments about Epstein flight logs. Generally, I like to be precise with my language but precision doesnt change certain things. I like to lead with dismantling suitcase/ballot container argument and drop ths truth bomb that the observers had left and they fontinued counting. Everyone thought they were leaving. They he got a phone call to keep counting or possibly the all clear sign.
They will always find a technical loop hole or create one. Ex: when they claimed the vaccines would be bleach. That was never ever said in the conference ever.
Make no mistake, I'm not saying we target the left. Just the sheeple who only watch certain news outlets but aren't full left. When you engage this subset they will filter your information through MSDNC, Ben Shapiro and the like, so it's imperative our language doesn't leave an opening for misdirection.
For example "I watched Ben Shapiro, he said there were no suitcases and those were regulation bins and it wasn't voter fraud. The MAGA crowd can't tell the difference between a bin and a suitcase, they have no idea if there was any election fraud or not".
Otherwise yes, what you're saying is correct. Donald Trump won, by a lot.
Probably because the sarcasm went over his head. I even toggled my letters. How much more obvious can I make it??
Yeah, he's replied in this thread more than once, I just picked this particular thread to respond to. From what I saw earlier everywhere he replied he was down-voted, which was trend enough I just picked one and spoke up. You're right, in this instance sarcasm was missed.
#NevarForgit
Pallets full of ballots, at 3 a.m.
indie bootleg version: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MaEL0JJaHkk
studio cut: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vrn7CJYvpdA
SoS staff did a press conference about this the day after the phone call and he does a great job of dancing around the details. Never explains why counting continued without observers in violation of the law.
Why is that bitch not in jail?
The people cheering as they kick watchers out and block windows so they cant see and the fact judges changed the laws should be stickied forever.
Shame on every Judge that refused to hear any evidence on ballot-fuckery.
Never understood why they needed table cloths on those tables.
I dun see notin
Can we get links for red pills? Impossible to find.
If you're looking for "suitcases" it's because there were none, OP is literally just lying. Georgia used rigid black plastic bins with sliding lids. There were no 'suitcases' or anything resembling them.
Trump's AG says there wasn't enough fraud to change the election outcome.
Trump praised that AG on his resignation .. after he made that statement. So, Trump seems to be ok with his conclusion.
Why still on this?
Navarro Report. Read it.