So they laid out legal strategies based upon publicly available information of illegal activities in the GA election and legally ran by this strategy with other DOJ officials who disagreed?
Huge scope for the smoothbrains. Hey, did you see we're sending troops to Syria?
They try to make everything sound so bad and yet when you read it there isn't anything illegal. This was a man that let the DOJ do whatever they wanted back with Mueller too so with that in mind it's even more ridiculous.
The unassuming lawyer who worked on the plan, Jeffrey Clark, had been devising ways to cast doubt on the election results and to bolster Mr. Trump’s continuing legal battles and the pressure on Georgia politicians. Because Mr. Rosen had refused the president’s entreaties to carry out those plans, Mr. Trump was about to decide whether to fire Mr. Rosen and replace him with Mr. Clark.
The department officials, convened on a conference call, then asked each other: What will you do if Mr. Rosen is dismissed?
The answer was unanimous. They would resign.
Their informal pact ultimately helped persuade Mr. Trump to keep Mr. Rosen in place, calculating that a furor over mass resignations at the top of the Justice Department would eclipse any attention on his baseless accusations of voter fraud. Mr. Trump’s decision came only after Mr. Rosen and Mr. Clark made their competing cases to him in a bizarre White House meeting that two officials compared with an episode of Mr. Trump’s reality show “The Apprentice,” albeit one that could prompt a constitutional crisis.
For discussing legal options to challenge illegal voting activities, and then not going through with it when others in the DOJ objected? I don't think so, dummy!
So they laid out legal strategies based upon publicly available information of illegal activities in the GA election and legally ran by this strategy with other DOJ officials who disagreed?
Huge scope for the smoothbrains. Hey, did you see we're sending troops to Syria?
They try to make everything sound so bad and yet when you read it there isn't anything illegal. This was a man that let the DOJ do whatever they wanted back with Mueller too so with that in mind it's even more ridiculous.
FAKE news. The NYTimes is one of the least credible sources there is. Garbage.
These type of BS stories are gonna come out until the impeachment.
Fucking doj deep state fucks.
Link direct to NYT art: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/22/us/politics/jeffrey-clark-trump-justice-department-election.html
The department officials, convened on a conference call, then asked each other: What will you do if Mr. Rosen is dismissed?
The answer was unanimous. They would resign.
Their informal pact ultimately helped persuade Mr. Trump to keep Mr. Rosen in place, calculating that a furor over mass resignations at the top of the Justice Department would eclipse any attention on his baseless accusations of voter fraud. Mr. Trump’s decision came only after Mr. Rosen and Mr. Clark made their competing cases to him in a bizarre White House meeting that two officials compared with an episode of Mr. Trump’s reality show “The Apprentice,” albeit one that could prompt a constitutional crisis.
100% Fake news
For discussing legal options to challenge illegal voting activities, and then not going through with it when others in the DOJ objected? I don't think so, dummy!