71
posted ago by AgnesDomini ago by AgnesDomini +71 / -0

https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/933/compelled-speech .....

ONE OF XIDEN'S FIRST EXECUTIVE ORDERS IS AN ATTEMPT TO LEGALIZE AND IMPOSE SUBMISSION TO THE BULLCRAP CONCEPT OF GENDER FLUIDITY ON AMERICANS. Biological males are given carte blanche to compete as females in athletics. (Next it will be for jobs.) If you don't want this clown world villainy to stand or worsen, if you are tired of being harangued by the ad infinitum gender terminology and self-identify preferences by which the deranged Left intends to cow us, and if you are mad as Hell and not going to take anymore the government trying to define what the definition of "is" is, then here's what needs to be done. (No grumbling without at least trying to offer solutions!) .....

Contact your states' AGs, and petition them to file First Amendment violations with SCOTUS to overturn this EO and put an end to this gender fluid identity crap. YES, you read correctly, First Amendment. First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion. If your sacred, foundational texts only recognize that God created males and females as distinct and discrete biological entities, then the federal government has no authority to compel you to believe otherwise. None. .....

Moreover, the First Amendment guarantees you the right to freedom of speech, meaning federal government has no authority to either compel you to use or punish you for refusing to use terms with which you disagree, including bullshit genders or even gender fluidity, since terms convey concepts which you reject as part of your beliefs. The SCOTUS has consistently ruled that speech cannot be compelled, AND, this is important, frens, it recognizes no distinctions between speech and beliefs per this regard----even children cannot be compelled to recite the pledge of allegiance to our flag if they don't believe in what it endorses, so we cannot be compelled to accept governmental imposition of pronouns or concepts with which we disagree...that would be finding people guilty of thoughtcrimes, ideas which challenge government-imposed ideology so as to reshape our reality by suppressing opposition to them. .....

GET TO THIS, PEDES. It would compel the SCOTUS to strike down this EO as being unconstitutional, and also make void Pelousi's new rules abolishing terms which denote gender and relationships because they regulate speech, which is illegal. The SCOTUS cannot rule otherwise without negating or reversing it's OWN legal precedence, including Roberts's OWN rulings. (Read the article linked above.) .....

Remember what the Mods' rules state: "Be Vigilant You represent the movement against communism - your posts and comments may become news." .....

FLOOD YOUR AG OFFICE WITH EMAILS AND CALLS TO REQUEST FILING SUIT TO STRIKE DOWN GOVERNMENT IMPOSITION ON FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOMS OF RELIGION AND SPEECH. IT COSTS NOTHING, AND ONLY TAKES FIVE-TEN MINUTES. PLUS IT WILL SEND PELOUSI INTO A TIZZY, BONUS.

Comments (9)
sorted by:
6
mugatucrazypills 6 points ago +6 / -0

JORDAN PETERSON WARNED YOU

4
mugatucrazypills 4 points ago +4 / -0

DAYLIGHT GENDER TIME: EVERYONE SWITCH TO FEMALE AT MIDNIGHT AND PUT THE CLOCKS FWD 1 HR !

They won't have any oppressors to go after. Demand preferential hiring for all positions on the basis of your new gender. All applications for all jobs and all forms should suddenly be "female"

4
BasedBoomerPede2 4 points ago +4 / -0

That is quite the rant Agnes...way to give it....Godspeed.

3
HidinginNY 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'd love to. But my cucked state has a cucked city that forces the state blue and their AG is the kind of fucker who let Antifa run rampant in the city for months while letting the mayor tie the police's hands behind their backs.

3
AgnesDomini [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Contact Jay Sekulow at the ACLJ. Super based lawyer---on Trump team--has won EVERY constitutional case he argued before the SCOTUS. He can file suit on behalf of plaintiffs in ANY state claiming these violations against them, free representation. AG is quicker route, but not the only one. The bakers sued by a homosexual couple for refusing to bake a wedding cake for them won on First Amendment grounds. So did the order of nuns seated behind Trump at one of his rallies. So did Alfred Adler, when he challenged the USDA for defining Man as "an other animal" (since the Holy Bible declares that we are made in the image and likeness of our God, and our God is NOT an animal).

2
HidinginNY 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for the info.

2
JustifiedTrumpian 2 points ago +2 / -0

You ain't teaching anyone without putting that shit into paragraphs

4
AgnesDomini [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

I originally typed it in paragraphs, and when it saved on my celly, it merged it all. I have edited the post to reinsert the paragraph breaks.

2
JustifiedTrumpian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Much better!