119
Comments (43)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
5
Jabblemonkey1 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Easier?" That's not the right question to ask.

"More effective at taking back our country" is the standard by which we should measure the desirability of forming a new party.

We know we can not trust the RNC at all, and we will be able to sway independent voters just as if not more effectively as a third party.

Remember, this is Trump leading a third party....it won't be a low energy Libertarian or Green party type organization that is essentially a debate club, it will be a vital, active, high energy movement. We have the numbers, the energy, the vision, and the leadership.

Let's do this.

2
Knight1_of_Sunset 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Easier?" That's not the right question to ask. "More effective at taking back our country" is the standard by which we should measure the desirability of forming a new party.

I would also would argue thinking about practicality issues on top of all of that too. The best solution in the world is useless if there is not a clear and practical way to get there. We know our long-term goals of MAGA and defeating the traitors within our country. We need to figure out our practical and achievable short and mid-terms goals to get there.

2
Boudicca2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I actually don't think we need Trump to lead this party. In fact, I think it would be better to not have the GEOTUS lead this party. We need a fresh start and fresh branding. It actually does not help us to be seen as "Trump supporters" "Trump Party" because then we are defined by every word the GEOTUS says and every action. That's not helpful actually because we can't control his actions. But we can control a party platform and brand it and control that brand if it's not associated with one person, especially a larger than life person like Donald Trump. If he focuses on creating a media platform that allows real free speech and exposure of our political party and platform, that is the best way he could serve the country no, IMO.

2
FreedomSteak 2 points ago +2 / -0

Second party

2
Jabblemonkey1 2 points ago +2 / -0

In reality, yes. The Uniparty needs real opposition.