You think I am a communist infiltrator because I don't hate women? Please make that case. I'm sure other people will be amused to watch you try and justify that.
You used the marxist term mysoginist unironically when it wasnt needed and think that women will resort to violence less frequently than men. Both NPC talking points.
I haven't tried searching for this data in a couple years and now I see it is almost impossible to find.
Women are just as likely to resort to violence as men. Anecdotally speaking, women lash out physically way faster than men.
Heres a couple articles for you to read since I can't find the raw statistics.
Easy to see why you fuckers believe the way you do.
First, the word 'misogyny' dates from the 17th century. It is far older than Marxism, so misogyny is not a Marxist term. Stop being a tard and trying to redefine language to serve your delusions.
Second, in the top article, yes, women CAN be as violent as men. Women are also more likely to admit to being violent with their partners, and men less likely to report being the victim of violence from women. That's because most violence from women doesn't actually hurt the men they slap, punch, or throw a bowl at. That sort of violence is more of a warning or signal than an attempt to harm.
Third, in the second article, it contradicts you. "Female criminals are disproportionately outnumbered by male criminals except in cases of human-trafficking," We aren't talking about human trafficking.
Fourth, if you read between the lines of that third article that was apparently written by a soyboy psychologist trying to paint a false image of equality over reality, a great deal of the 'violence' that women use against men are 'stand-off' actions. Pushing or slapping to make a point, rather than to cause harm.
Now, don't get me wrong, women can be violent with the intent to cause harm, but even the last article you provided uses weaselwords and moving goalposts to force a point that can't stand on it's own.
I'm still chuckling because you are so desperate to defend your misogyny with science that you are proving yourself to be a shill.
It might also be that women have historically been less likely to resort to violence to resolve problems.
Check your misogyny at the door, please.
Spotted the communist infiltrator
You think I am a communist infiltrator because I don't hate women? Please make that case. I'm sure other people will be amused to watch you try and justify that.
You used the marxist term mysoginist unironically when it wasnt needed and think that women will resort to violence less frequently than men. Both NPC talking points.
I haven't tried searching for this data in a couple years and now I see it is almost impossible to find.
Women are just as likely to resort to violence as men. Anecdotally speaking, women lash out physically way faster than men.
Heres a couple articles for you to read since I can't find the raw statistics.
Easy to see why you fuckers believe the way you do.
https://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2018/09/women-can-violent-men/
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/11/female_offenders_perpetrators_predators_and_pedophiles.html
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/women-are-more-violent-says-study-622388.html
Chuckle away you fucking commie.
His profile 1/2 way checks out....
First, the word 'misogyny' dates from the 17th century. It is far older than Marxism, so misogyny is not a Marxist term. Stop being a tard and trying to redefine language to serve your delusions.
Second, in the top article, yes, women CAN be as violent as men. Women are also more likely to admit to being violent with their partners, and men less likely to report being the victim of violence from women. That's because most violence from women doesn't actually hurt the men they slap, punch, or throw a bowl at. That sort of violence is more of a warning or signal than an attempt to harm.
Third, in the second article, it contradicts you. "Female criminals are disproportionately outnumbered by male criminals except in cases of human-trafficking," We aren't talking about human trafficking.
Fourth, if you read between the lines of that third article that was apparently written by a soyboy psychologist trying to paint a false image of equality over reality, a great deal of the 'violence' that women use against men are 'stand-off' actions. Pushing or slapping to make a point, rather than to cause harm.
Now, don't get me wrong, women can be violent with the intent to cause harm, but even the last article you provided uses weaselwords and moving goalposts to force a point that can't stand on it's own.
I'm still chuckling because you are so desperate to defend your misogyny with science that you are proving yourself to be a shill.
I noticed the unused sword on the ground. She's just having regrets.