I also rarely engage in Ad Hominem attacks. You might try engaging in a discussion without logical fallacies sometime. The people you are engaging might think you are worth listening to, instead of just laughing at you as you struggle to force your beliefs into places where logic and facts can't go.
"It might also be that women have historically been less likely to resort to violence to resolve problems."
"yes, women CAN be as violent as men. Women are also more likely to admit to being violent with their partners, and men less likely to report being the victim of violence from women."
Try to throw in cognitive dissonance and straw man next time you reply to me. You haven't used those yet. I think you are a closet marxist. You haven't changed my mind, only reinforced the idea with your contradictory comments and defend women at all cost by interpreting their intentions to fit your leftist narrative.
"A great deal of the violence is to make a point or as a stand off actions"
So you know what goes on in the mind of a women when she becomes violent? Her insecurities? Her frustrations? What drove it? What motivated it? What triggered it?
I defend women because I understand that women and men are different. I also understand that women being different from men does not make them inferior.
As for what might be going on in a woman's mind when she becomes violent? In my experience, really bad puns and sexist jokes frequently resulted in a punch to the shoulder or an elbow in the ribs. I also got a couple jabs from young ladies on a few occasions during house parties when they got crowded and people started bumping into each other.
Of course, if someone has never had female friends or a relationship with a female, it might be difficult to imagine a punch or elbow just being part of the relationship, rather than being an effort to cause harm.
Calling people out for their ignorance and blatant stupidity is not an Ad Hominem attack. An Ad Hominem attack is when you use a personal attack in substitution for a real argument.
I use the word correctly, and with cause.
I also rarely engage in Ad Hominem attacks. You might try engaging in a discussion without logical fallacies sometime. The people you are engaging might think you are worth listening to, instead of just laughing at you as you struggle to force your beliefs into places where logic and facts can't go.
"I also rarely engage in Ad Hominem attacks."
"Check your misogyny at the door, please."
"written by a soyboy psychologist"
"It might also be that women have historically been less likely to resort to violence to resolve problems."
"yes, women CAN be as violent as men. Women are also more likely to admit to being violent with their partners, and men less likely to report being the victim of violence from women."
Try to throw in cognitive dissonance and straw man next time you reply to me. You haven't used those yet. I think you are a closet marxist. You haven't changed my mind, only reinforced the idea with your contradictory comments and defend women at all cost by interpreting their intentions to fit your leftist narrative.
"A great deal of the violence is to make a point or as a stand off actions"
So you know what goes on in the mind of a women when she becomes violent? Her insecurities? Her frustrations? What drove it? What motivated it? What triggered it?
Maybe you should check your misandry at the door.
I defend women because I understand that women and men are different. I also understand that women being different from men does not make them inferior.
As for what might be going on in a woman's mind when she becomes violent? In my experience, really bad puns and sexist jokes frequently resulted in a punch to the shoulder or an elbow in the ribs. I also got a couple jabs from young ladies on a few occasions during house parties when they got crowded and people started bumping into each other.
Of course, if someone has never had female friends or a relationship with a female, it might be difficult to imagine a punch or elbow just being part of the relationship, rather than being an effort to cause harm.
Calling people out for their ignorance and blatant stupidity is not an Ad Hominem attack. An Ad Hominem attack is when you use a personal attack in substitution for a real argument.
Which is what you did. You called him a misogynist without supporting your argument.
Also:
"I also understand that women being different from men does not make them inferior."
No one said they were inferior. That came from you. Women are not immune from criticism just because.
I didn't need to support the argument. His statements made it very clear that he believes women are inherently mentally inferior to men.