4855
Comments (251)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
234
PotatoJoe 234 points ago +235 / -1

This is about Warren Buffet and his trains moving oil. The pipeline was going to cut off his destructive, polluting cash cow. He paid for his part of the fraud, now he wants to collect

111
elvisbird 111 points ago +111 / -0

100% correct. Now we can have train derailment again with explosions.

105
Hshsvsvsvsv 105 points ago +106 / -1

Reminder that liberals also campaigned against Green energy like nuclear power

Nuclear power is safe and clean and the only realistic alternative to oil and fossil fuels..

Liberals campaigned against it because their special interests wanted them to..

57
Wexit-Delecto 57 points ago +60 / -3

Liberals don’t want us using any energy. It is not about pollution, they just don’t think nature’s bounty is ours.

38
spezisthedevil 38 points ago +39 / -1

They are antihuman luciferians.

22
Isolated_Patriot 22 points ago +22 / -0

Oh but they love all their technology and amenities. It's the elite that want their serfs to have a lower quality of life.

12
Trump_USA_2020 12 points ago +12 / -0

Liberals want to feel better, in the sense that any pollution isn't so obvious and plain to the eye. For pipelines, the pollution is quite obvious to the liberals, since they feel hurt when Native American tribes complain and say that the pipelines are desecrating their cultural heritage. Also, in the minds of the liberals, potential pipeline leaks and pollution of groundwater is very obvious to them.

But the liberals will be fine with solar panels that require all sorts of heavy metals mined from Africa or China or other less developed nations to actually function properly. Liberals will be fine with the windmills manufactured and assembled in China. Are these green energy components produced through equally polluting manufacturing processes? Of course that is the case, and it is especially the case, since these less developed nations are permitted by the globalist UN, World Bank, WHO, and lots of other international agencies to purposefully have very lenient environmental laws. But you know what, because the pollution is happening over there and not on the lands of a Native American reservation, the liberals are totally fine with that. They wouldn't dare to take a closer look.

Honestly, humanity was conditioned to destroy and pollute after Adam and Eve got fooled by the serpent. There is no way to escape our current trends of unmitigated destruction and pollution of the natural environment, unless we want to go back to the days of zero plumbing, zero electricity, zero running water, zero heating and cooling, and even zero toilets. We may be able to stop polluting by a lot, if we choose to return to the 1700s and to live like animals in mud huts and log cabins with gravelly floors. Why do we have so much pollution? Because we want to be hygienic and modern... that's why. Living more primitively is definitely possible, and honestly, this extremely conservative solution is also the most sustainable one. So then, it's time for us to change our expectations and go back to the good old days.

Regarding all of the hygiene, plumbing, and utilities, humanity as a whole ended up bamboozling ourselves. Now, we are stuck between wanting to save the planet by living more primitively to actually live more sustainably and wanting to safeguard the health of the human population through hygiene and modern safety regulations for our homes and buildings. Of course, the globalists want to solve this conundrum by stealing all of our property so that a one-world government owns everything and runs the world. I say, let's just go back to the days of 200 acres for each family, a small farm for each family, and self-reliant communities... as intended by Thomas Jefferson and the Founding Fathers.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
justwow 3 points ago +3 / -0

Correct

27
Wahzuhbee 27 points ago +27 / -0

My most successful red-pilling experiences are all around asking green-oriented liberals why they don't push for nuclear power. It's literally the solution they're looking for but their corporate propaganda keeps their eyes off of it and gives them a reason to dislike it.

19
LiskaEman 19 points ago +19 / -0

Don't forget to point out to them that their windmill farms and their solar farm installations, quite literally, include cutting down mass amounts of forests and fields/animal habitats! It's fun

5
WhiteTrashJesus 5 points ago +5 / -0

Because it requires competence and responsibility to not kill everyone, which are lacking. I am personally opposed to nuclear plants anywhere where a democrat could possibly ever be required to take action to maintain it or even be within a 100 mile radius. Oh the local nuclear plant needs funding for repairs? Well we will write a bill for it, but it also includes provisions for mandated abortions and requirements to quarter lgbtq muslim migrants in your house. Oh the opposition doesn't want that? we'll have to all be radiated then and it's their fault

15
thisguy883 15 points ago +16 / -1

Nuclear would have killed big oil, coal, and natural gas.

No fucking wonder they wanted to get rid of it by spouting scare campaigns.

"Muh Chernobyl "

Chernobyl was the result of communists cutting corners to save a buck. Nothing to do with the reactor melting down because "it will eventually happen". Dumb fucks.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-2
Pandas4Trump -2 points ago +6 / -8

Killed, no. Brought down the cost of energy globally, yes. Oil is needed until hydrogen nuclear fusion can produce the near endless energy needed to create synthetic petrochemicals

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Hunter1970 2 points ago +2 / -0

But muh three-headed fishes

1
ParticleCannon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hooray, we saved the environment

1
Efrum 1 point ago +1 / -0

Already starting in Washington. Helped along by some Antifa sabotage.

42
KarpLykov 42 points ago +42 / -0

The killer is.... they are now going to invade Syria TO INSTALL A PIPELINE !!!!!!

19
IvIA6A 19 points ago +19 / -0

Already started sending in convoys to invade the oilfields in the north.

12
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
Gr4ck3L 4 points ago +4 / -0

If the rankand file military knew this and there was conscientious objection.. Well that would be interesting. The plot is exposed, there only needs to be action.

10
Isolated_Patriot 10 points ago +10 / -0

And after all the reveals of the last four years, these corrupt millionaire politicians will successfully get their seats at the little billionaires table.

8
ClaytonMagnet 8 points ago +8 / -0

Along with it will come all the same Dubya/Obama era bullshit like proxy wars, terrorism, refugee crises, etc.

3
D0NNIE_DARK0 3 points ago +3 / -0

Duh but don’t say that around Smurfection. He’s waiting for war to be announced in Army magazine. Pointing out the obvious is crying wolf.

25
BallsackPaneer 25 points ago +25 / -0

In the industry. The statement about Warren Buffet is 1000% accurate.

Follow Warren's involvement with OXY and their purchase of Anadarko petroleum and you'll find that it's in his best interest to limit competition to OXY's Permian Basin production.

The pipeline vs. rail transport battle has been going on since the days of Rockefeller vs. Vanderbilt. Nothing has changed.

6
SOL170 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yup, shutting down fracking on Fed land directly impacts the Bakken, Williston Niobrara and Powder River production Basins.

8
thisguy883 8 points ago +8 / -0

Bingo.

Has nothing to do with pollution.

Has everything to do with crony crooked corporate types.

1
trump_2077 1 point ago +1 / -0

THIS RITE HERE FUCK THAT CRONY BULL . SHIT

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
6
Neil_Patrick_Covfefe 6 points ago +6 / -0

Also the politics of revenge. It creates a lot of jobs in red states.