Comments (251)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
TwelveMoreYears 1 point ago +1 / -0

What are renewables?

Solar panels last for 25-years and there is no set recycling method for them.

Wind turbines need consistent maintenance and blade replacement. Old blades go to the trash heap. Still only 12% efficient when they're working.

Biogas essentially creates CO2 in the process, and even more when its methane constituent is burned. And the process usually requires more energy than burning CH4 yields... aka non-renewable.

Geothermal... for now, I guess. Entropy will inevitably win that race, however, and our unifying, warm little rock will freeze.

Hydrothermal... for now as well.

Even thorium, with its large abundance, is finite in availability.

So what is a renewable energy source in a grandeur scheme?

PraiseBeToScience 3 points ago +3 / -0

Uranium isn't infinite either, however we can build reactors that basically use nuclear fuel to create even more new fuel. It's not perpetual energy but it's about the closest thing.

mulejuicemcquaid 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fusion would run on the most abundant atoms in the universe. It's a technology that's "just 20 years away" and has been since the 70s, but it should become viable sometime this century.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
TwelveMoreYears 1 point ago +1 / -0

The point I'm making is your "urgency to optimize renewable technology" shock and awe is well-scripted and hasn't been the answer for over a decade now. It's time we allow nuclear fission to be the answer, as a society. Can we decide on that?