6450
posted ago by Shadowman3001 ago by Shadowman3001 +6453 / -3

Don't mind me, just saw an article about gulag searches for Patriot Party skyrocketing. Be a shame if the comments were all Patriot Party!

Edit because too many of you weren't here back in the old days when we did this all the time. The point is to boost search results for patriots.win using a popular term (Patriot Party)

Comments (723)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
FightingPatriot17 2 points ago +14 / -12

THERE IS NO PATRIOT PARTY

THERE IS THE SYSTEMATIC DESTRUCTION (POLITICALLY RELAX FBI) OF THE 10% RHINOS REMAINING IN OUR NEW REPUBLICAN PARTY

TRUMP SHOWED US HOW TO WIN, THANK YOU!

19
BabbleRabble 19 points ago +19 / -0

No...they are all shit and need to be wiped clean.

10
VarusSPQR 10 points ago +10 / -0

YES! We need a clean slate! EXTREME VETTING!

11
BabbleRabble 11 points ago +11 / -0

We also nees to realize that the Patriot Party isnt meant to split the Republican party, but rather to unite Republican and Democrat voters who are DONE with a corrupt government.

6
Chef_von_todes 6 points ago +6 / -0

Think about what our voting numbers would truly be? 90 Million? 100+ Million?

1
WeCax49 1 point ago +5 / -4

Ross Perot tried that, and it ended up giving the Democrats 8 years of the presidency.

7
MastaJoda 7 points ago +7 / -0

Only because the dumb fuck stopped his campaign at the height of his popularity, and when he came back in the race, it was all over. Ross Perot fucked himself. Period. He was skull dragging the dems and Repubs before he strangely shut his campaign down. Perot was a fucking idiot.

4
HerrnMalor 4 points ago +4 / -0

I voted for Ross and would have done it again. Do you really think that Globalist Bush41 would have been better than Clinton? They are the same. The two shared a tent in the rape of Haiti.

1
WeCax49 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good for you, but you're not understanding my point. My point was that you voted for Perot, and got Clinton, despite the fact that Perot was hugely popular. You split the vote.

11
Iliterallylovejv 11 points ago +11 / -0

Where are you getting your 10% number from?... CNN? It’s more than half. The Republican Party betrayed the best President ever. Lindsey Graham’s comment in the article is ironic because he tried to erase Trump. He knows his time is coming.

6
WeCax49 6 points ago +6 / -0

2/3rds of the House GOP objected to the electoral college.

6
Iliterallylovejv 6 points ago +6 / -0

There were 138/211 house republicans who voted to reject Pennsylvania and Arizona’s electoral votes. That’s a bit more than half. However, in the senate, only 7/50 senators voted to reject those electoral votes.

2
WeCax49 2 points ago +4 / -2

There's a reason why Trump literally said he'd help the Republicans win back the House and Senate in 2022. It's why he started a PAC designed to help Republicans. He's smart enough to realise that a third party doesn't help.

2
WillHammer 2 points ago +2 / -0

10%?? Bit low lol

0
RiseOfTyranny 0 points ago +4 / -4

Patriot party sounds nice but I tend to agree with this poster. There are millions of die hard Republicans simply not with the times and we need their votes. If Trump can't make absolutely certain we won't be fractured then we're fucked.