649
Comments (61)
sorted by:
27
strictly1957 27 points ago +29 / -2

Women's suffrage... that moment shit went wonky!

20
Lobo 20 points ago +20 / -0

Allow a large amount of the population with no skin in the game to vote? What could ever possibly go wrong?

11
blurryface 11 points ago +12 / -1

Womens Suffrage is what went wrong after they made the decision you described.

Universal MALE suffrage was the beginning of the problem.

Leaders lead. Women aren't leaders.

We were led here by men.

10
Swift_phoenix 10 points ago +11 / -1

The right to vote should be male AND you pay taxes AND you never get a refund from the fucking FEDs or State assholes. If you are on welfare no right to vote until you have paid taxes without getting refund for 5 years. That would solve a lot of BS

4
Watermelons 4 points ago +4 / -0

Assuming that no refund means no net positive wealth transfer from you to the government, I agree. I don't agree with the female sentiment.

4
Swift_phoenix 4 points ago +4 / -0

Have you looked at the demographics of how women vote? One word - collectivism.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
1
blurryface 1 point ago +1 / -0

Annnndd....you own property.

4
strictly1957 4 points ago +4 / -0

Perfectly stated Fren. Absolutely perfectly said!!!

10
blurryface 10 points ago +11 / -1

They should have kept it land owners only.

Guarantee it wasn't those men who voted for suffrage.

7
Watermelons 7 points ago +8 / -1

The founders didn't because it would've led to an aristocracy similar to what it was in feudal England. If that were the case nearly everyone would not own land. The only people who would own land would be robber barons.

1
blurryface 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just curious.

Do you own property?

Property owners vote to make it easier to own property. Especially small ones, like local family farms. There are (or used to be) many more of them than people wealthy enough to own lots of property.

The idea you're saying is actually the reality we live in because of the liberal politics we have succumbed to. Not because of the conservative policies I'm suggesting.

It's counterintuitive because of all the BS they feed us. But it's true. There are more obstacles to property ownership NOW than there were when landowners were the only voters.

1
Watermelons 1 point ago +1 / -0

While what you propose may appear to be a good idea, I don't believe it is.

This notion has persisted since Athens. Eventually it leads down a bad road. The alternative, (what we have now), also leads down a bad road if unchecked. We're seeing it today. Basically a democrat vote is bought with handouts.

This is the argument given in the anti-federalist papers. Freeholders failed 7-1.

Under every view of the subject, it seems indispensable that the Mass of Citizens should not be without a voice, in making the laws which they are to obey, and in choosing the Magistrates, who are to administer them, and if the only alternative be between an equal and universal right of suffrage for each branch of the Government and a confinement of the entire right to a part of the Citizens, it is better that those having the greater interest at stake namely that of property and persons both, should be deprived of half their share in the Government; than, that those having the lesser interest, that of personal rights only, should be deprived of the whole

I believe this was Madison.

You can read the whole thing here:

https://www.let.rug.nl/usa/documents/1786-1800/the-anti-federalist-papers/qualifications-of-suffrage-(august-7-10).php

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
4
VoidWanderer 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pushed by communists over a hundred years ago. (the bolsheviks) Gee, I wonder why people that have an interest in destroying western society to replace it with communism would push for something like that.

It's a scooby doo mystery...

1
strictly1957 1 point ago +1 / -0

A mystery I tells ya!

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
strictly1957 3 points ago +3 / -0

And its a been shit show ever since...

3
sjriver 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fact

17
consumptiveballerina 17 points ago +17 / -0

As a woman, I think women are too damn sensitive. He called a fat pig a fat pig, and REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE oRaNgE mAn Bad. Meanwhile he's cracking down on human trafficking and preventing dudes in dresses showering with your daughters.

5
MeanMisterMustardCap 5 points ago +5 / -0

BASED.

3
zakat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also realize it's not fine to call a fat pig a fat pig. Because how dare you how someone looks?

But at the same time it is fine to make fun of Trump as "orange man". The left is just full of hypocrits.

11
KimJung-Un 11 points ago +15 / -4

White women are the dumbest creatures on this planet. Prove me wrong.

17
JoePedoCheated 17 points ago +17 / -0

Not all white women, fren.

Kayleigh McEnnany, Melania, Lauren Boebert, Marjorie Greene, Kristi Noehm, Laura Loomer, Kimberly Guilfoyle, my wife.

I know others privately.

But Woke White Women...Yeah, they're traitors to this Country, not to mention white people in general, and there are far, far too many of them.

-1
KimJung-Un -1 points ago +3 / -4

Laura Loomer is a disgusting Zionist. Hardly white.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
10
Sigma 10 points ago +10 / -0

I think that’s what happens when you take away religious and American values and have no firm ethnic identity to fall back on.

2
KimJung-Un 2 points ago +5 / -3

Agreed. The Zionist plan.

0
MeanMisterMustardCap 0 points ago +2 / -2

JESUIT plan.

6
MeanMisterMustardCap 6 points ago +6 / -0

You've clearly never interacted with black women.

-3
KimJung-Un -3 points ago +1 / -4

You're referring to their emotional behavior. That doesn't mean anything in relation not what I'm talking about. A white woman a stupidity is one that lacks self preservation. Black women aren't missing this very important concept.

White liberals hate themselves and especially white men. This is almost exclusive to white women.

5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
-1
KimJung-Un -1 points ago +1 / -2

Don't confuse who I'm talking about with you're daughter you simp

1
SirLlama 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know, the more I hear people using the word simp, the more I feel like it's some sort of projection. People using that word are often not more mature or masculine than lefty soyboys.

1
KimJung-Un 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can feel whatever you want, doesn't make it any more factual than me calling you a cuck. Doesn't mean you're a cuck, it's just a feeling I have.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
KimJung-Un 1 point ago +1 / -0

Black trashy women who live in gutter situations and behave gutter, sure. Educated white women hate white men more than the gutter black hood rats and go out of their way to sleep with anyone but white men. Literally cum buckets for the planet. I suspect many of the offended here have never lived in a city or gone to university in a big city.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
KimJung-Un 1 point ago +1 / -0

Liberal white women are far worse than your perception of hood rat blacks.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
KimJung-Un 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not my point. A liberal Karen hates white men, wants to see the destruction of the white race and will do anything to make white people disappear. She is the lowest creature.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
11
Food4thought 11 points ago +11 / -0

Trump acting all American and stuff was the worst. /s

9
Mtnlion667 9 points ago +9 / -0

Thank you for using nitter!

A lot of people will be getting forced red suppositories because they refused our offered redpills earlier.

6
TEXinLA 6 points ago +6 / -0

Play stupid games.

5
sully 5 points ago +5 / -0

The kicker is we warned everyone about this bullshit. But everyone was so hung up on the Chinese propaganda about Biden being the savior of our nation. Crock of horseshit and now all these blue-haired morons can serve themselves a nice plate of crow every day.

It's our fucking turn.

4
Reaganomics 4 points ago +4 / -0

There are idiots of all sexes, races, and religions. Being a woman does not automatically mean you are a stupid, emotional beast.

4
MakeAmericaRichAgain 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's also his fault for not just telling his wife how to vote.

4
ChynaBiden 4 points ago +4 / -0

but muh green jobs

3
Serioussurfaholic 3 points ago +3 / -0

My grandmother taught me well. She said if you couldn't think like a man, you shouldn't set foot in the voting booth. If you couldn't effectively debate a man and wanted to vote, you should vote candidates favored by the smartest male you know. If giving up my vote would insure only net tax payers, property owners and constitutionalists could vote I would do it in a heartbeat. I would still qualify, unless they limited it to males in those categories. But even if it was male only the end result would be worth it. Screw ANY voter, female or male, that is an idiot.

2
amarie 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm female and I agree with you.

3
Serioussurfaholic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not surprising here lol. Nice to run into fellow ladypedes.

3
PatriotChang 3 points ago +3 / -0

Saw this yesterday and all I have say is GO WOKE GO BROKE BABY

2
amarie 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not white or black, it's female. As a female with three daughters, I understand. Women are fickle. It impedes long term planning.

2
Dogpile1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hopefully she and her family will starve to death.

2
SeF1 2 points ago +2 / -0

We may not have much of an economy left after 4 years, but the schadenfreude will be epic!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0