396
Comments (70)
sorted by:
12
1PeopleCorporation 12 points ago +13 / -1

I worked with someone that was perfectly healthy. Took a flu shot the company was pushing. Dead by 8PM. Made mental note to self to never take a flu shot.

-1
JaoBiZen -1 points ago +2 / -3

Holee 😶

4
Range4harry 4 points ago +4 / -0

Too much mRNA

4
PropagandaWizard1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

Europe has stopped giving the vaccine to those over 75 because of chance of death. They literally killed Hank Aaron.

3
JaoBiZen 3 points ago +8 / -5

I think it’s because it overloads your immune system, especially in blacks. So it destroys your system making you vulnerable to anything

6
aKekabove 6 points ago +7 / -1

all animal testing of mrna vaccines in the past were stopped because they caused the next illness you got to be fatal..... all these people getting this vaccine the next wave of colds or flu are going to kill them they will say its the next covid strand and use it to lock everyone down again the cycle repeats only with more deaths be careul dont take teh vaccine

1
MaxineWaters4Prez 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gonna need a source on that.

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
-1
grassshrimp -1 points ago +1 / -2

New accounts always posting complete bullshit. This place is going to shit.

-3
JaoBiZen -3 points ago +1 / -4

Not a new account but continue

-13
Mrs_Fonebone -13 points ago +3 / -16

Apart from racism, what's your basis for this assertion about the immune system? Source or you are just a racist.

4
BillDBlasiosBlackSon 4 points ago +5 / -1

Source or you're a racist!

The Governmentâ„¢ doesn't want to kill black people, what (syphilis testing) made (AIDS testing) you (cervical cancer testing) think (human radiation experiments) that? (Etc.)

-8
Mrs_Fonebone -8 points ago +2 / -10

LOL, the past, yeah, take that one incident and generalize it--but maybe take off your tinfoil hat.

1
BillDBlasiosBlackSon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, because black people getting experimented on is funny.

:)

0
JaoBiZen 0 points ago +5 / -5

Dumb bitch

-7
Mrs_Fonebone -7 points ago +3 / -10

Thanks for giving me the ammo to report you.

3
MustBeTrump 3 points ago +4 / -1

Don't be a fucking retard, this isn't reddit, we're not the left. We don't celebrate or even advertise that we're reporting someone because they said mean words.

It makes you look pathetic.

Also screeching about racism makes you look pathetic, who cares if someone is a racist, stop feeding into lefty narratives.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
JaoBiZen -1 points ago +4 / -5

You mad? LMAO

0
BillDBlasiosBlackSon 0 points ago +1 / -1

"Alright, there was that one time, but REAL government assistance has never been tried!"

Where have I heard this argument before?

-2
JaoBiZen -2 points ago +4 / -6

It’s not racism. Blacks are more vulnerable to COVID. Look it up

1
IslamIsEvil 1 point ago +1 / -0

obesity is a risk factor for COVID, as well as for many other problems.

blacks are more likely to be obese, due to worse exercise and eating habits.

it's not a race issue unless you make it one.

1
TrumpAndGodWin 1 point ago +1 / -0

According to Alex it's because the virus was man made and contains the aids injection system, a system which is many times more effective against blacks because aids was also created to target them (possibly 47 times more likely to infect them). Blacks are also more likely to be deficient in vitamin D and most deaths occur in those with low D levels.

0
Mrs_Fonebone 0 points ago +3 / -3

You need science. The truth is, ALL the "science" on the "covid" is funded by govt shills, like Fauci and WHO. The test numbers, the tests, the death rate, etc etc. The story that "masks" could filter a virus. So yeah, you can't point to anything that is a fact except that it is the least lethal flu that ever hit the US. The "official" death rates were off by orders of magnitude. So yeah, science is the answer. So far, the science facts are yeah, a mild flu dressed up and lied about as a political tool around the world.

-3
Mrs_Fonebone -3 points ago +2 / -5

You are the one who made the assertion--what is your source? Otherwise it's just you typing on the internet.

2
JEARS 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think because blacks are more likely to have a vitamin D deficiency ( by a lot as it were ) they are more likely to risk getting covid than whites.

Spain just did a study showing that those taking vitamin D supplements were 82% less likely to get covid. My mom just got prescribed vitamin D for this reason.

So yes blacks are more likely to get covid and a big factor is likely to be their higher vitamin D deficiency rate.

1
MustBeTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is possible but a lot of the headlines that were originally pushing the "blacks are being hit worse with covid" was because they were simply ignoring any kind of social distancing or regulations/lockdown orders.

Then when this was pointed out, the media tried to cover for them by claiming that it's because black people do the hard jobs that white people aren't willing to do!! So they're more at risk of coming into contact.

If you have any doubt about that, or you still think that black people suffer more when they catch Kung Flu, then go look at Africa. They're absolutely fine there. Other than the fact that they're Africa.

1
JEARS 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wonder if it's because they take that malaria drug in Africa or maybe get more natural vitamin D . Who knows , could be any number of things. Diet, exercise, comorbidities? I live in a historically black neighborhood. When the covid news hit it was initially reported that it was older white people that were getting it and that blacks were immune. That was the crazy rumor spreading in our community. People were jokingly calling it mayocide. Anyway we were pretty lax with masks and other safety protocols, in fact masks were not mandated in stores here until summer. Then the media flipped the script and said blacks were most at risk and people started to practice the stated safety measures. I heard the other bs about who is working in more dangerous situations and well suffice it to say I think that's bs and certainly isn't the reality here.

-1
Mrs_Fonebone -1 points ago +3 / -4

You realize we have zero reliable statistics on death rates from Covid? But that we do know the survival rate is above 99%?

-3
JaoBiZen -3 points ago +1 / -4

Retard. Check the comments

-3
Mrs_Fonebone -3 points ago +2 / -5

I already reported you for not knowing how to behave on a grown-up site.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Chuj 1 point ago +2 / -1

He was 86. Living in borrowed time - average male lives to be 73, black men lower (but data shifts with gang folk dying young)

Coincidental that he died within weeks of the shot but not proof. Be rationale pedes

2
MaxineWaters4Prez 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hear you, I believe you, and I agree with you. With that said I'm going to use this as an argument against the vaccine because being irrational and spouting partial truths hasn't stopped the other side for 5 years. So fuck em.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
-2
Mrs_Fonebone -2 points ago +2 / -4

OH, so you are a racist. You bring me the statistical data to show this. Also, being murdered has nothing to do with your health state. I had no idea there were so many experts on the health and status of the Black community.

0
Jleinf 0 points ago +1 / -1

Guillian barre rates for Covid vaccine are the same as the flu vaccine per a neurology friend. Gillian barre kicks in 3-42 days after inoculation

0
deleted 0 points ago +4 / -4
4
ImpregnatingYourDad 4 points ago +4 / -0

to be fair, its hard to believe any numbers (according to the experts, the only person in America who had Covid19 but died from other causes, was George Floyd), so higher profile examples like this have more impact, even if it is just an outlier

I sure as hell don't expect them to be truthful about the numbers of people who have had the vaccine and then died suspiciously close to the date of vaccination

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
JEARS 3 points ago +3 / -0

But we have no research on long term impacts yet is that not true? For my part I'm in no rush to get a new vaccine rushed to the market. I prefer to take a more cautionary approach and I think that's prudent. I also have no reason to believe the efficacy rate is anywhere close to the 95% rate they are claiming.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
JEARS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting thanks for that feedback.

2
MustBeTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Always a pleasure to see our very own Based Medical Doctor appearing on threads like this. What's your take on the vaccine? No concerns at all? Would you/have you taken it yourself or would you rather risk catching Kung Flu and fighting it naturally?

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
3
sCiEnCe_ErMagEhD 3 points ago +3 / -0

"permanent loss of taste and smell" bwahahahaha

Doctors are the CNN of the professional working class, if 2020 hasn't taught us that, it's taught us nothing.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
SpaceCadet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you had the second dose yet?

1
MaxineWaters4Prez 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its only been available for 2 months, on a very limited basis. I'm curious to see what transpires over the first year or two.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
DiscoverAFire 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you link to a study? All the talking heads are saying "its safe, it's like any other vaccine, trust the doctors" but won't go into the science of it or address actual underlying issues, likely because they have no idea

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
DiscoverAFire 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks! reading the whole thing.

1
DiscoverAFire 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because these replicons lack endogenous viral structural genes, they are unlikely to produce infectious virions or virus-like vesicles at the injection site in subjects after vaccination

So in a self-amplifying mRNA vaccine, the portion of the injected mRNA that codes for replication is not itself replicated? Is that what this is saying? I'm trying to figure out how they keep it from running away.

1
MaxineWaters4Prez 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've had a fully functional immune system for decades also with no long term effects.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Quality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Understood, but historically, information on vaccine injuries has been notoriously difficult to obtain. If ten-thousand people dropped dead after being vaccinated, you're probably not going to see it in the headlines.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-6
Mrs_Fonebone -6 points ago +4 / -10

LOL, 86 year old man dies. OH WAIT HE GOT A VACCINE THAT MUST BE WHAT KILLED HIM. You're just recycling MSM garbage

3
blackkit27 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Every real study has talked about it being a Death or Infertility Shot within 5 Years. Same folks talked about it being a Depopulation Agenda for the Elderly, maybe you should pay attention and realize the endgame for the same Globalists that cheated Biden into office.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
0
Mrs_Fonebone 0 points ago +3 / -3

Every "real" study--what are those? Vs. what? "Some folks talk about" etc etc if you can't give a source, it's just you typing. Also, MSM is not a legit source. I like how you think I haven't been paying attention, LOL. Yeah, no doubt Bill wants depopulation, but the virus failed miserably. However, they HAVE managed 5to cower and break weak people who are faithfully wearing their muzzles and isolating and following all the "rules" -- all right out of how you do communist takeovers. Dehumanize, people. Make them weak and afraid.

2
JohnCocktoasten 2 points ago +2 / -0

If that same 86 year old man died 2 weeks after testing positive for COVID-19, what do you suppose the cause of death would be recorded as?

2
vatrump2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now that biden is president, it will be cancer or something other then covid. There will no longer be car accidents listed as covid they dont need it anymore. Even CNN stopped the covid death ticker.

1
Mrs_Fonebone 1 point ago +2 / -1

You mean, using the fake pcr test that now even the WHO has discredited? And that even the inventor of the pcr test said was not meant to be a diagnostic test ever?