2659
Comments (156)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
189
381
Kraznaya 381 points ago +383 / -2

Let's not spread disinformation.

This bill expired on 1/3/21 when the 117th Congress was sworn in. I don't doubt they'll revive it, but this bill is dead

94
Skogin 94 points ago +95 / -1

👆👆👆👆👆👆👆

64
deleted 64 points ago +65 / -1
17
Hanging_Chad 17 points ago +18 / -1

👣

58
Patriot_Lettuce 58 points ago +58 / -0

This is why the crowd sourcing of news and info on this website is the best.

Yes there's bad info, but we got a good community that verifies the info.

Good job Pede, keep up the good work! Carry on.

o7

4
HocusLocus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well said. Grab a coat. Be kind to the cabbage-heads.

4
thesteelerfan18 4 points ago +4 / -0

need coat bots back!!!

1
Perhelion 1 point ago +1 / -0

(`_´)ゞ

16
Llegien20 16 points ago +16 / -0

Right, plus isn't the guy who fronted this ridiculous bill also the guy who thought that moving too many soldiers to one side of Guam would capsize the island? Lolol

4
FabsMagicHat 4 points ago +4 / -0

I remember seeing that when I was a kid and finding it hilarious and then I looked him up a couple years ago and I saw he was still in Congress and couldn’t believe it.

3
BlackPillBot 3 points ago +3 / -0

He’s an affirmative action diversity hire. He ain’t going nowhere. He’s a super citizen with protections and privileges we can only dream of.

2
IvIA6A 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah Hank Johnson is about as dumb as they get.

8
mrxforsenate19909902 8 points ago +9 / -1

Here's the issue. They WILL revive it with a stacked Congress. That's the problem.

2
President_Elect_Pepe 2 points ago +4 / -2

If you don’t doubt they will revive it then why exactly are you objecting on the basis of “disinformation”???

1
DonJr24 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Left will just say it's a dead bill, you're bitching about nothing.

0
Kraznaya 0 points ago +1 / -1

Cause they haven't yet.

If they do, point to the new bill. Don't cite a dead one and say it's legit/urgent. It's neither. We don't want to get "boy who cried wolf" syndrome working here when there's plenty of real shit going down that's also really bad.

1
President_Elect_Pepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s the thing though man.

Nobody said the bill was current.

They confirmed the language as stated was correct.

It’s inarguable that this language being proposed is an issue of concern.

You’re the one changing the context, which is why I asked why you would do that.

The notion that it has some random date of expiration really changes nothing. So I’m genuinely confused why you would want to downplay it.

As YOU stated they would likely revive it, therefore it IS an issue of concern.

Sounds to me like you’re hard shilling.

-1
Cantshadowbanthemall -1 points ago +2 / -3

I think this just shows 255 shill votes

Mods! Ban these upvote IPs

25
sgt_richard 25 points ago +31 / -6

Should be stickied

46
StrongPeacemaker 46 points ago +47 / -1

FUCK edit: 2A is the last line in the sand we can retreat to... Change my mind

49
MageGills 49 points ago +52 / -3

You're right, except for the fact that if anybody brings up using our 2A for it's meant for, you get called a glowie and told to be peaceful.

45
deus_vult 45 points ago +45 / -0

To be fair, talking about it on a site openly monitored by the FBI is not the smartest move, whatever your opinions on it. Talk to conservative friends around you in the real world, make sure you are on the same page with them, and have backup methods to contact them if something large scale happens.

6
I_Love_45-70_Gov 6 points ago +6 / -0

Just Bernie leftovers and China shills who hate guns and America.

3
NomadicKrow2 3 points ago +3 / -0

“Stand your ground, don’t fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here.” - Captain John Parker

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
Lowersidecustoms 7 points ago +7 / -0

We have 2a to keep them from fucking with things like 2a, if we allow them to confiscate guns they'll do whatever they want to us. I don't expect any bans immediately, they've failed many times already. they'll tax everything until nobody can afford it just so they can say "you CAN still have guns, we're not violating anyone's rights", very similar to how they handled cigarettes and nearly taxed and banned them out of existence

4
PraiseBeToScience 4 points ago +6 / -2

99% of the people who claim they need the 2A to oppose tyranny will literally never lift a finger to defeat it, and all this time secretly just wanted to play with toys.

3
Senpai_See_you 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree with this. I also think the right to play with these toys is still vitally important.

Go ahead and LARP as someone always at the ready to fight tyranny. Don't LARP as someone who's going to be aggressive, that'll just get your ass thrown in jail. But I want the government afraid of its people with no real idea how many competent, willing patriots they'll have to contend with if the frog ever notices it's being boiled.

1
FutureMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

At that point you'll have no choice.

2
ANTI_Globalist12 2 points ago +2 / -0

INFORM THE GOP

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
AmericanJawa 4 points ago +4 / -0

For now...